Little higher # on sexual SE, not good. (nm)

Posted by Phil on August 16, 2002, at 12:23:33

In reply to some Lexapro clinical info » Anyuser, posted by pharmrep on August 15, 2002, at 23:41:35

Thread

Anyone switched to Lexapro? « ggrrl Dr. Bob 6/11/02
...
Re: Interesting article » Anyuser Ritch 8/7/02
Re: Interesting article » Anyuser Geezer 8/7/02
Re: Interesting article » Ritch SLS 8/10/02
Re: Interesting article » SLS Ritch 8/10/02
Lexapro approved » Ritch pharmrep 8/15/02
Re: Lexapro approved Anyuser 8/15/02
Re: Lexapro approved » pharmrep johnj 8/15/02
Re: Lexapro approved » pharmrep Ritch 8/15/02
Re: Lexapro for you » Ritch pharmrep 8/15/02
Re: Lexapro with less s/e » johnj pharmrep 8/15/02
some Lexapro clinical info » Anyuser pharmrep 8/15/02
That is the FRX press release. Thanks anyhow. (nm) » pharmrep Anyuser 8/16/02
Little higher # on sexual SE, not good. (nm) Phil 8/16/02
Re: sexual s/e Phil » pharmrep Phil 8/16/02
Re: sexual s/e » Phil pharmrep 8/17/02
Re: that Phil, he's a manly hi-T kind of guy ;-) (nm) » Phil .tabitha. 8/17/02
Re: Lexapro is no different from Celexa dr. dave 8/19/02
Re: Lexapro is no different from Celexa » dr. dave Ritch 8/19/02
How do you act on that information? » dr. dave Anyuser 8/19/02
Tangent on Costs shar 8/19/02
Re: Tangent on Costs » shar Anyuser 8/19/02
Re: Lexapro is no different from Celexa » dr. dave johnj 8/19/02
Re: Lexapro is no different from Celexa (I agree) (nm) Maximus 8/19/02
Re: Lexapro is no different from Celexa Patson 8/19/02
Re: Lexapro side-effects Patson 8/19/02
...
Re: Anyone switched to Lexapro? » lil jimi lil jimi 9/8/16

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Phil thread:109458
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20020814/msgs/116623.html

	for
in