Posted by Lou Pilder on May 8, 2008, at 11:34:29
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Robert Hsiung-takrespon » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on May 4, 2008, at 19:17:21
> Hi Lou
> I can understand that Bob might feel he needs a staff with stuff like this.
> I feel like I need some Dexedrine and morphine just to get to the bottom of the page.
> But anyway....
>
> As I understand it, all this is about the fact the it very well might be considered uncivil for you to post that the rider said to you
> 'have no other Gods before me'. (Now I've said it).
> But this is the first commandment, or similar to it.
>
> So is it a question for you of not only justice being done but being seen to be done?Sigismund,
You have brought some issues into focus here. I am asking that if anyone is considering to be a discussant in this thread that they read in the link offered here (citation tustn) about the fallacy of {appeal to probability} and aquaint yourself with the aspects of it in posting your response here. In particular, but not limited to, the aspect of {standard} along with it. If you could do that, then I think that that could enhance the discussion and could bring out another aspect of this discussion with that established here.
Lou
citation tustn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_probability
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:821127
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/827928.html