Posted by SLS on February 13, 2008, at 14:39:29
In reply to Re: Board Name Change, posted by Justherself54 on February 13, 2008, at 10:50:37
> > > > After working with the "Neurotransmitter" board for a number of weeks, do you still think it is productive to separate out polypharmacy from monotherapy? Should a board dedicated to polyphamacy be called "Neurotransmitters"?
> > >
> > > Scott, thanks for your input. I still do think there are advantages to separating out polypharmacy, but I agree that a name change might be called for. I'm leaning toward Psycho-Babble 301 (see above), but haven't had time to change it. What do you think of that as an alternative?
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> > Growl...
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I guess I'm intransigent on this one.
> >
> > I apologize for the hostile tone in my previous post. Perhaps this is more important to me than it should be.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to change the medication board to 201 then?I don't know. Giving out numbers seems to somehow minimize the suffering or deservedness of one group over the other. Will it be "cool" to have a type 201 versus a type 101 disorder? Maybe the 101s will feel abandoned by the 201s because they are somehow deemed less sick and might be neglected by the 201s?
So, then, how does a 101 profit from the people who post exclusively on the 201 board? Just redirect people all over the place, I guess.
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:806657
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/812508.html