Posted by SLS on February 11, 2008, at 9:28:36
In reply to Board Name Change Neurotransmitters » Neuroscience, posted by SLS on January 15, 2008, at 7:06:46
Hi Doctor.
After working with the "Neurotransmitter" board for a number of weeks, do you still think it is productive to separate out polypharmacy from monotherapy? Should a board dedicated to polyphamacy be called "Neurotransmitters"?
Yuck. What a mess.
I am quite able to remain open to consider other alternatives. I was just wondering if you were.
This is broken. I hope you come to see that the weaknesses in your system are nothing to be ashamed of. I would like to see you keep all medical clinical threads on one board. I still think that "Neuroscience" is a more intelligent choice for naming a board about an organ that has multidudinous properties and a plethora of physiologies. The brain cannot be well understood by explaining it in terms of a set of chemical messengers without taking into account circuitry. The CNS and its control or influence over the rest of the body cannot be denied. This is neuroscience.
I don't like the fact that seemingly all of your decisions relating to the operation of YOUR site are such that it seems reconsideration of a decision is for some reason prohibitive.
I heard that you have never been wrong. One time, you thought that you were wrong, but it turned out that you were mistaken.
:-)
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:806657
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/812013.html