![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 37 to 61 of 63. Go back in thread:
Posted by Phillipa on June 3, 2007, at 21:52:00
In reply to Re: Nardil, new side effect; swollen ankles/GG » stargazer2, posted by gardenergirl on June 3, 2007, at 21:34:47
GG Bun and creatinine are included in the standard electrolyte test so I'm sure you getting them checked. Love Phillipa
Posted by gardenergirl on June 4, 2007, at 1:51:53
In reply to Re: Nardil, new side effect; swollen ankles/GG » gardenergirl, posted by Phillipa on June 3, 2007, at 21:52:00
Posted by Owsley on June 4, 2007, at 7:45:40
In reply to Nardil, new side effect; swollen ankles, posted by stargazer2 on June 2, 2007, at 16:48:05
Hi all, first post :)
I have been on and off Nardil and Parnate a number of times due to side-effects. I am presently on Parnate because, for me at the right dose, it is the best medication I have tried. Regarding your side-effects, I have had them too. The most irritating were the distention of the abdomen and the swelling of my ankles (especially the left).
I had two diagnoses for the swelling. One was Edema and the other Erythema Nodosum - an allergic reaction. I would always get the swelling from Parnate when I was just starting it. It would always go away within a few weeks unless I was on my feet most of the day (work) , then it would last a lot longer. What I did is got a doctor's note stating that my physical duties should be light due to a temporary physical condition. That helped a lot. Also, wearing a shoe that was large and loosely tied did seem to help - especially with the pain lol.This is my opinion, but I am convinced that the swelling is an allergic reaction to the MAOI. I had the swelling on both Nardil and Parnate and it both cases it went away eventually. Right now I am on 90mg of Parnate and feeling better than "blah". I hope this post helps you relax a little and you to be kind to your body by giving it a chance to adapt to the MAOI. MAOIs are one strange class of drugs :)
> Today I woke up with a new side effect of Nardil: swollen ankles. It is quite pronounced on both my external and internal malleolus (ankles). This was not present in the first few weeks of Nardil, so it is a later effect but obviously I'm concerned because it is quite obvious and I'm wondering if it is caused by a touch of CHF (congestive heart failure) Anyone else with this side effect and if so, what was done to relieve the swelling other than telling you to elevate your legs as much as possible. Was Lasix ever prescribed for this or another diuretic? Perhaps a natural diuretic since I tend to have low BP and a diuretic may cause my BP to drop further...
> My ankles were never thin to begin with, so now they really are prominent and they ache.
>
> Stargazer
Posted by stargazer2 on June 4, 2007, at 15:04:20
In reply to Re: Nardil, new side effect; swollen ankles » stargazer2, posted by Owsley on June 4, 2007, at 7:45:40
Owsley, Thanks for your input,the swelling seems a bit better the last 2 days and has shifted to the external ankles and not so much internal.
Obviously, its better in the morning after they have been elevated at night, so mornings, they are the least swollen. I also tried to take the majority of the dose later in the day to see the effect and that may have helped.I just paniced as initial swelling was quite prominent and came after no swelling or unmanageable sideeffects for about 3 weeks. I thought, here we go again. It's always something with living with depression.
Also, my mood initially seemed less depressed and now after a few weeks, the effect has lessened and the effect is harder to discern. I hope it is still working or I'll be very disappointed as the initial response seemed clearly effective. Perhaps another dose increase will be forthcomin. I'm currently on 45 mg and now sleeping better than a few weeks ago.
Mood is harder to guage and daily mood variations are normal anyway so you can't judge anything by a day or two. At least that is what I think.
I just hope the Nardil continues towork for me else I'm at a real loss as to what to do next. Its been exhaustng to continue this fightfor so many years. Life shouldn't be this difficult all the time...Stargazer
Posted by FredPotter on June 4, 2007, at 18:06:17
In reply to Re: I never had a GOAL of losing weight » FredPotter, posted by UgottaHaveHope on June 1, 2007, at 2:37:53
I must repeat that in my case I gained weight without changing my eating habits, so something metabolic is going on. I seem to suffer from dizziness and orthostatic hypotension, as separate things. I have to concentrate when I'm moving about as I sometimes stagger and people think I'm drunk (now why would they think that?) and there's the sleepiness in the day, although I sleep fairly well at night.
The other day I was playing in a band and closed my eyes to concentrate. This is jazz you understand and the idea is you bliss out, but I fell asleep for an instant and when I came to I had to remember what we were playing. Laugh!
Has anyone followed the recommendation to lower the dose when low MAO has been achieved? I can see this would work if MAOI was all it was but Nardil has a GABA effect, hence the anxiolytic effect. But perhaps I can gain that with Xanax
Fred
Posted by gardenergirl on June 4, 2007, at 18:44:41
In reply to Re: I never had a GOAL of losing weight » UgottaHaveHope, posted by FredPotter on June 4, 2007, at 18:06:17
> I have to concentrate when I'm moving about as I sometimes stagger and people think I'm drunk (now why would they think that?)
That passed rather quickly for me. But I know what you mean about how folks think you're drunk. It's disconcerting.
>
> The other day I was playing in a band and closed my eyes to concentrate. This is jazz you understand and the idea is you bliss out, but I fell asleep for an instant and when I came to I had to remember what we were playing. Laugh!I do that here at my desk. Not that I'm blissing out at my desk, but sometimes I just close them for a moment to get a break from visual stimuli and I find I've gone out like a light for a sec.
>
> Has anyone followed the recommendation to lower the dose when low MAO has been achieved?Whenever I lower beyond 60 mg I get depressed again. :(
gg
Posted by stargazer2 on June 5, 2007, at 20:31:05
In reply to Edema better today/owsley, posted by stargazer2 on June 4, 2007, at 15:04:20
I started Nardil on 5/15 and quickly felt better and knew this medication was doing something many others had failed to do. That effect lasted perhaps two weeks. The last few days I am feeling bored, purposeless and unmotivated which are some of my typical symptoms of depression.
Do you think I am due for a increase in dosage because of these symptoms? I'm due to see my pdoc next Friday after I see the research pdoc who I saw prior to starting Nardil. I was feeling so good initially I felt like my appt with him would be unnecessary and here I am having more symptoms again. I think I'll give my pdoc a call tomoroow to ask him if I should go up to 60 mg and see what this does.
I hope it will keep working since I am at a loss as to what to do anymore...Nardil was my last hope and I want it to work so badly.
What other meds can be added to Nardil to enhance purpose and motivation? GG, I know you tke Lithium, what effects did it enhance with Nardil?
Stargazer
Posted by Owsley on June 5, 2007, at 22:05:13
In reply to Edema better today/owsley, posted by stargazer2 on June 4, 2007, at 15:04:20
Hi Stargazer.
Interesting that you should write that the swelling has shifted outward. That is where I had all of the swelling when I first got it from Parnate. I still have a scar where they took a tissue sample approximately 2 inches above my outer ankle, left foot. Maybe it has something to do with the pressure of walking? I don't know...
My last experience with Nardil was about 7 months ago. The gastro-intestinal side-effects motivated me to ask my Pdoc to go on something else. With me, I was at 60mg. If I went above that, the side-effects became markedly worse. I was about 91 Kg in weight.
I have gotten an initial euphoric effect from MAOIs so maybe that is what you are experiencing? I would get a good amount of energy and then the response would flatten out. The medication would still work, just not at the same level. If I felt it was no good I would either increase my dose, stop to go on another medication, or augment the medication with something else. For example, right now I have to augment Parnate or else I get really tired in the middle of the day.
Take care!
> Owsley, Thanks for your input,the swelling seems a bit better the last 2 days and has shifted to the external ankles and not so much internal.
> Obviously, its better in the morning after they have been elevated at night, so mornings, they are the least swollen. I also tried to take the majority of the dose later in the day to see the effect and that may have helped.
>
> I just paniced as initial swelling was quite prominent and came after no swelling or unmanageable sideeffects for about 3 weeks. I thought, here we go again. It's always something with living with depression.
>
> Also, my mood initially seemed less depressed and now after a few weeks, the effect has lessened and the effect is harder to discern. I hope it is still working or I'll be very disappointed as the initial response seemed clearly effective. Perhaps another dose increase will be forthcomin. I'm currently on 45 mg and now sleeping better than a few weeks ago.
>
> Mood is harder to guage and daily mood variations are normal anyway so you can't judge anything by a day or two. At least that is what I think.
>
> I just hope the Nardil continues towork for me else I'm at a real loss as to what to do next. Its been exhaustng to continue this fightfor so many years. Life shouldn't be this difficult all the time...Stargazer
>
>
Posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 6:26:02
In reply to Nardil effects waning at 45 mg, posted by stargazer2 on June 5, 2007, at 20:31:05
For those of you on 60 mg, how do you take the pills, 4 spread out over the day or 2 in the morning and 2 at night? Since they tend to make me groggy, I think taking 2 together is a better way to take them but I'm not sure if this is the prescribed way or if it even matters. Interested in finding out what others do at this dosage or above.
Stargazer
Posted by gardenergirl on June 7, 2007, at 14:26:59
In reply to Nardil effects waning at 45 mg, posted by stargazer2 on June 5, 2007, at 20:31:05
Lithium seemed to be the "missing ingredient" to get me all the way over the depression hump. It's hard to characterize exactly what it did. I guess it was more uplifting or mood enhancing, maybe? Before I was always hovering between sort of depressed and sort of not depressed, but I never really felt like myself or felt good. Once lithium kicked in, I felt happy, though not euphoric. But generally cheerful, goofy/silly, which is my normal personality, and less fatigued and sluggish.
Before that I'd added Lamictal, which helped some, though I wonder if it's doing enough to warrant continuing it now that I've started Lithium. And Provigil to combat the afternoon fatigue and to help regulate my sleep/wake cycle. My new pdoc doesn't seem to agree that I need Provigil, but he doesn't object enough to suggest DC'ing it. Every visit, though, he asks, "What are you taking that for again?" It helps a teensy bit with inattentive ADHD symptoms, too, but not as much as I'd like.
Oh, and I read below you're going to 60 mg. I used to take that in four spread out doses. I now take 2 in the a.m., one around 2 p.m., and the last one sometime between 8 and 10 p.m. I try not to take that last one too late, because I suspect it plays a role in the nighttime eating I often do, to my detriment. In the past, I took one in the a.m., two at 2:00, and one at night. I don't know that there's much difference, but that might have increased the afternoon sleepiness. Not sure. Occasionally if I get up really late, I take two when I get up and two in the evening. That doesn't seem to hurt anything, but it's hard to sort out because sleeping really late is not good for me in general.
Good luck! And as a reassurance, many of the side effects I get at 60 mg or higher have eventually gone away. Some took awhile, but they went away.
gg
Posted by FredPotter on June 7, 2007, at 15:36:36
In reply to Upping my dose to 60 mg...When to take?, posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 6:26:02
one when I wake up, one at lunch time and 2 towards bedtime. It works for me but doesn't follow any logic. As far as I can gather the grogginess would be cleared at a stroke by Modafinil but it's too expensive here in New Zealand. The Dr's never heard of it of course. Mind you he hadn't heard of Nardil either, only what he read in his text book while training
Posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 19:34:49
In reply to Re: Upping my dose to 60 mg...When to take?, posted by FredPotter on June 7, 2007, at 15:36:36
Today I took 2 in the morning and I was asleep at 3 pm so it definately makes me more tired. I think over time it will be better than taking 1 in the morning an 1 in the afternoon since that really makes me tired, but taking 2 at night is helpful with good sleep promotion. I wish I could take all 4 at night but then I may never wake up, but it may eliminate the daytime grogginess.
Is taking them all at night ever recommended when daytime sleepiness is an issue especially since the formula has changed and the pills dissolve much quicker than they ever did before Pfizer messed with the ingredients? Which leads me to my next question...
Have you ever submitted a formal complaint about the change in the medication since it is a very different pill than the original Nardil and supposedly Pfizer never applied for the formula change with the new ingredients. They considered it the same medication although users noticed a very differnt effect with differnt side effects.
One thing I notice is that the dosage required now is much higher leading me to believe that the coating contributed to a longer lasting effect and a lower dosage than is now required.
Does anyone know what the half-life is now since since the 2003 formula change, has it become shorter with the pill coating being softer? It seems like the effects are more immediate and not as long acting which may mean taking 4 at night is not so ludicrious if the effects are more immediate than in the previous pill composition.
Comments?...Stargazer
Posted by brooke484 on June 7, 2007, at 20:53:59
In reply to Half life of 'new' Nardil, taking 4 at night ?, posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 19:34:49
I'm about to up my dose to 30 mgs. I take one when I get up. Do you remember when you took your second dose? My doctor says bedtime but I wanted your opinion.
Also, about the "new" nardil...I'm having major side effects (I hope I can even make it to 30 mgs) so I contacted my compounding pharmacist to see if she could do something with the pills. I'm still waiting for her to call me back but when she does I'll let you know what she says. That is why I have been trying to get in touch with Michael Bell. He used that Plasmin Plus and said it helped, but it's too expensive ($30 for 30 pills or something like that). I think he also used honey, but I wasn't sure how that could help.
brooke
Posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 23:56:25
In reply to stargazer2, posted by brooke484 on June 7, 2007, at 20:53:59
Definately take your second dose at bedtime. The pills make me sleepy (don't they you?) so it helps at night to get a really good sleep.
I looked up Plasmin Plus but didn't understand what it is for. What are your side effects?
Mine were the ankle swelling, which is better after a few days and the GI upset, I guess from faster breakdown of the pills from the new formulation which melt in your hands if they get wet so they obviously breakdown alot quicker than the older version.
One other intersting thing I found was that the half life ranged from 1.2 hours to 12 hours but I think the twelve hours was before Pfizer messed with the hard coating on the pill, so I wouldn't be surprised with the shorter half life. I also read something about how once the enzyme is inhibited, then it is not as important to keep the higher dose in your system and a once a day dosing is enough. The rules of half lives and dosing were all over the place ,not consistent at all, so no wonder there are so many opinions on what is best to do, once a day dosing vs. several times a day.
I also read that after a few weeks on a higher dose, you can cut back to 15 or 30 mg and be Ok. Not sure of that either. Pfizer's package insert was no help either, no wonder, they were the ones who messed the original formula up causing chaos for everyone who was stable on it for years. Nice to know the pharmaceutical companies are motivated primarily by greed and profits, not patient care and accountability for consistent products.
Stargazer
Posted by brooke484 on June 8, 2007, at 8:32:39
In reply to Brooke, posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 23:56:25
My main side effects are GI. Ugh. As soon as I take the pill I feel sick. I have stomach pains and am nauseous. I can't eat for a log time after I have breakfast. Does this go away? When I took the old Nardil I didn't have any side effects at all!
brooke
Posted by stargazer2 on June 8, 2007, at 13:00:15
In reply to stargazer2, posted by brooke484 on June 8, 2007, at 8:32:39
Brooke, I had really bad gas in the beginning which has improved, although due to this I started taking fiber twice a day and I think this has helped with the gas. It is one thing after another but I think today I will try 1 pill in the morning, 1 around 4pm and 2 at night, which works to put me to sleep. Equally divides doses are not working very well becasue of the afternoon sleepiness.
You may want to try your entire dose at night or depending on your dose at least half of the total dose at night. I find this minimizes daytime drowsiness if you experience this at all.
I too took the old Nardil but back in 1987, it worked very well and then stopped but I think I should have persisted with it and gone to a higher dose since all the years since, the meds have proven to be rather ineffective for me. Lots of med trials but no real good response like Nardil and Marplan. Marplan was discontinued in 1994 (no reason except poor sales) and I was left high and dry, sort of like with Nardil reformulation. Years since then trying everything without much success so hopefully Nardil will be the one, although Pfizer had to go and get their grimmy little hands on the reliable formula and mess with it. Why are these drug companies allowed to do this when human lives are depending on a drug that works for them! It is unconscionable but we know why it's done, for the almightly dollar, never the patients unless the sales volume justifies ongoing production. Look how they are talking about eliminating Emsam now because of poor sales, not poor patient responses. Dollars win out over a drug's efficacy and use.
Stargazer
Posted by Phillipa on June 8, 2007, at 19:54:48
In reply to Nardil, old and new formula, posted by stargazer2 on June 8, 2007, at 13:00:15
Stargazer it's sad as it has taken people a year to figure out how to use EMSAM successfully and avoid all the side effects the first takers had. So now a lot of good responses and that will be the end of it. The reason I wanted the EMSAM was you could see it and psychologically for me this gave a sense of security as I could rip it off if side effects too bad. And I know the med stays in your system for a while but I'm a got a see it person. Love Phillipa
Posted by brooke484 on June 9, 2007, at 8:37:26
In reply to Nardil, old and new formula, posted by stargazer2 on June 8, 2007, at 13:00:15
Are you sure it's been discontinued? They have a web site http://www.marplan.com
brooke
Posted by stargazer2 on June 9, 2007, at 11:23:36
In reply to marplan, posted by brooke484 on June 9, 2007, at 8:37:26
I know it's back now, 10 years later, too late for my lost years since discontinued in 1994, so since then I've lanquished trying to find a med to work as well as Marplan or Nardil. My pdoc felt I would respond to all the other, newer, "improved",less toxic meds out there but I never got the same response to any other med like I got to the MAO's, with the exception of Parnate, which I never responded to.
Hearing that Marplan was "back" I tried it last Spring and it bombed so perhaps like Nardil, the formula was different. They can't just leave well enough alone, those pharma types who don't understand a so called "trival" change (aka money savings) like the medication coating can make major changes in the way the drug works. DUH! Testing the new Nardil on real depressed patients would have proved how different it was from the original formula...
SG
Posted by brooke484 on June 9, 2007, at 19:07:55
In reply to Re: marplan, posted by stargazer2 on June 9, 2007, at 11:23:36
I feel your pain. I really do. I've been searching for the right medication ever since 1992 and it's been torture. I can't believe I'm living my life this way (well, it's not living really. I call it surviving). Just when I think Nardil might be the last resort, I find out they changed the pill. Well, I guess I could try Marplan. :)
brooke
Posted by stargazer2 on June 9, 2007, at 22:01:16
In reply to Re: marplan, posted by brooke484 on June 9, 2007, at 19:07:55
Brooke, are you not sticking with Nardil becasue of the GI SE's? They all have SE's to some degree, so just when you think you were worse off on something you realize it worked better than the one you just switched to. It's a game and the stakes are very high.
As you know I have spent more than half my life with trying to find something that has worked enough so that I could work and live a relatively "normal" life. Some years have been more tolerable than others with an OK combination but never feeling all that great. The last few years have been very difficult and you forget how much life is lost to med trials when you basically are just alive waiting for something good to happen. Alot of time is wasted trying so many meds but then without trying you essentially are still wasting your life.
I haven't been off meds for more than a few trial months since 1987 when I tried my first AD and I waited until my late 20's to take my first AD since I denied I was depressed until then. The meds back then, pre-Prozac, were not all that good, although the second med tried, Nardil, worked for about 2 years, then it pooped out when an inexpereinced young pdoc kept trying to get me off of it. I think I probably only needed a higher dose and it would have worked fine. They knew so little about raising doses back then.
Oh well, hopefully Nardil will be the one, I haven't given up on it yet. It's doing something, just with the side effects, the positive effects are still unclear.
Good luck to you finding one that will benefit you as well,if Nardil isn't the one for you.
Stargazer
Posted by brooke484 on June 10, 2007, at 9:43:14
In reply to Re: marplan, posted by stargazer2 on June 9, 2007, at 22:01:16
No, I'm not going off nardil yet. I plan to stick it out for at least 3 months (it's only been 2 weeks so far). You know, when I tried Imipramine for the first time I needed 400 mgs for it to work. Well, the second time I needed 450 mgs for it to work, so maybe you just needed a higher Marplan dose, and Nardil dose. The only reason I'm a little discouraged about this Nardil is because I took 75 mgs back in 96 and that made me feel only so-so. My doctor wouldn't go any higher than that. So, if 75 mgs didn't do anything back then, how much would I need now with these new pills???
brooke
Posted by FredPotter on June 10, 2007, at 15:34:24
In reply to Brooke, posted by stargazer2 on June 7, 2007, at 23:56:25
There has been some discussion about this. If MAO inhibition were all it was then reducing the dose after a few weeks would make sense, but Nardil also has GABA-related anxiolytic effects, which would argue against dose reduction
Posted by stargazer2 on June 10, 2007, at 22:13:45
In reply to Re: Brooke » stargazer2, posted by FredPotter on June 10, 2007, at 15:34:24
So would this matter whether your diagnosis is depression or anxiety with dosage reduction after a few weeks? I'm not even thinking to reduce the dosage yet but for someone with depression alone is this reduction a possibility?
Or does the newer formula eliminate this completely since the medication does not work the way the original formula did. It seems the half life went from 12 hours to 1.4 hours which tells me it is broken down much quicker now so the rules may have changed as the drug works very differntly since the formula change in 2003. Pfizer did not change any of the package inserts to reflect the changes though, acting like the two formuals are the same, which they clearly are not. The usual smoke and mirrors...
Stargazer
Posted by Phillipa on June 10, 2007, at 22:30:29
In reply to Fred Potter/Reduction of dosage, posted by stargazer2 on June 10, 2007, at 22:13:45
Is the manufacturer the same in New Zealand? Love Phillipa
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.