Re: lower block length

Posted by Dr. Bob on September 5, 2010, at 19:39:51

In reply to Re: blocked for 6 weeks, posted by muffled on September 5, 2010, at 14:34:25

> It was some time since the original post was made, with no further uncivil posts. Might it be possible to put a lower block length if the original poster effectively ceased and desisted after an intervention?
>
> Dinah
> I agree...
>
> muffled
Would you have preferred a shorter block? Or no block at all?
Bob
a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy

Thread

Where is Lou? topcatclr 8/30/10
...
Re: magical thinking? » violette Dinah 8/30/10
Re: magical thinking? violette 8/30/10
Re: please rephrase that » topcatclr Dr. Bob 8/30/10
(((Dinah))) I'm asking for clarity..... 64Bowtie 8/31/10
Re: (((Dinah))) I'm asking for clarity..... » 64Bowtie Dinah 8/31/10
Re: Re: (((Dinah))) 64Bowtie 9/1/10
:) » 64Bowtie Dinah 9/1/10
Lou's request-izwhatihtiz » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 9/1/10
Lou explains what he thinks could be done- Lou Pilder 9/1/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks » topcatclr Dr. Bob 9/4/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks » Dr. Bob Dinah 9/4/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks muffled 9/5/10
Re: lower block length Dr. Bob 9/5/10
Re: lower block length » Dr. Bob Dinah 9/5/10
Lou's views-ehvree » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 9/5/10
Re: lower block length muffled 9/6/10
Re: lower block length Dr. Bob 10/1/10

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:960581
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20100806/msgs/961410.html