Posted by Rzip on October 17, 2000, at 4:46:16
In reply to Re: Hypotheses, posted by Dr. Bob on October 17, 2000, at 1:10:48
> Dr. Bob,
Sounds great as long as you think the phenomenons are covered. Just thought to help and tighten the hypotheses up with practical examples. I am certaintly not going to attack the wording of the actual hypotheses since I assume every word is weighted for one context or another.
Good luck with your list of hypotheses. How long have you been revising it?
> I am not sure which hypothese this exactly fits, but I just want to say that one of the downfall of on-line communication is having the DEGREE AND DEPTH of one's emotions/actions misunderstood.
>
> That one I put under: "Online text communication is more subject to "simple" misunderstandings and conscious and unconscious distortions of meaning or intent." Although on reading that again, I don't know why I put "conscious" in there...
>
> > The overwhelming benefit of on-line communications is of course, the chance to "freely" express oneself and see how it measures up to what one imagines the responses to be.
>
> And that one I put under: "A person can use online text communication as a way to explore and experiment with new behaviors or different aspects of their identity. What they learn or rehearse online can be carried into their offline life."
>
> Does that sound OK?
>
> Bob
poster:Rzip
thread:844
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20001011/msgs/1177.html