Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » Dinah

Posted by ace on November 3, 2003, at 1:07:44

In reply to Re: David D. Burns Quack MD ?ace, posted by Dinah on November 2, 2003, at 7:42:31

I think they deserve to be treated with respect.
>
Absolutely...when I said 'I will try and disprove them' I did not mean being sarcastic or in any way derisive. I would keep my tone genuine and respectful. Everyone has a right to their views- just as I believe Burns is a quack someone might think his technique is great- good for them!
I would pose my objections in an respectful way.
Ace.

Thread

David D. Burns Quack MD ace 10/30/03
...
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD Poet 10/31/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD stjames 10/31/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » stjames ace 10/31/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD Dinah 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD sb417 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD stjames 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD stjames 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » ace NikkiT2 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » Dinah ace 11/1/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD stjames 11/2/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » ace Dinah 11/2/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » ace mattdds 11/2/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » Dinah ace 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » mattdds ace 11/3/03
More Re: CBT » ace mattdds 11/3/03
Re: More Re: CBT irishcatholic 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » ace NikkiT2 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD irishcatholic 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » Dinah stjames 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » stjames ace 11/3/03
Re: More Re: CBT » mattdds ace 11/3/03
Link for Matt ace 11/3/03
Re: Link for Matt- Attempt #2! ace 11/3/03
Re: Mistake Ace made ace 11/3/03
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » NikkiT2 ace 11/3/03
...
Re: David D. Burns Quack MD » PSM ace 11/26/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:ace thread:275048
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20031030/msgs/275974.html