Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is!

Posted by Brainbeard on April 3, 2011, at 13:52:24

In reply to Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! » Brainbeard, posted by Franz on April 3, 2011, at 8:09:29

> Sorry, I forgot to ask about which side effects. Escitalopram 10 mg did not cause me erection problems, yes delayed eyaculation but it seems it gets better on time. Would this be a good indicatior that low dose prozac won´t be bad in this area?
I was meaning the usual kind of problems, that is difficulty reaching an orgasm, less pleasurable orgasms, and possibly erection problems.
It might be an indicator, yes. You will have to try to find out. Don't forget that Prozac stays in your blood for about a month and messes with your liver enzymes, i.e. inhibits 2D6.
>
> Thanks
My pleasure.
Current meds: clomipramine 225mg, fluvoxamine (Luvox) 50mg, dexamphetamine 5-10mg, bethanechol 20-60mg. As needed/wanted: oxazepam 5-20mg.

Thread

Prozac not potent 5-HT2C antagonist conundrum 11/26/09
Re: Prozac not potent 5-HT2C antagonist mtdewcmu 11/26/09
Re: Prozac not potent 5-HT2C antagonist » mtdewcmu conundrum 11/27/09
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! Brainbeard 12/30/09
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! » Brainbeard mtdewcmu 12/31/09
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! Brainbeard 1/2/10
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! West 3/14/10
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! Franz 4/2/11
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! Brainbeard 4/3/11
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! » Brainbeard Franz 4/3/11
Re: 'Prozac not potent (...)' - Yes it is! Brainbeard 4/3/11

Post a new follow-up

[981849]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Brainbeard thread:927037
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/neuro/20100607/msgs/981849.html