Posted by KayeBaby on March 26, 2007, at 2:03:57
In reply to Re: correction, posted by Squiggles on March 25, 2007, at 20:05:44
> Many I'm sure, from adverse drug reactions,
> overdosages, prescription errors, interactions,
> suicide, and other causes.
>
> But the rhetorical impact would be greater if the numbers were actually counted and compared to the alternatives, in proportionate manner as alternative drugs are far fewer in use.
>
> Your humble servant :-)
I will have to do some researching but if nutrient-bases therapies were compared on a case by case basis-I suspect drug therapy would produce more fatalities. It would be ver hard to do a fair comparison though. Not many people are going to get alternative tratment for a heart attack or an amputation (I don't think it would be appropriate-but I sure there are some that would)I ahve experimeted widely with medication and nutrients and my worst side effects came fro the meds. But-nothing ventured-nothing gained in either case.
Peace,
Kaye
>
> Squiggles
poster:KayeBaby
thread:744072
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20070320/msgs/744270.html