Posted by ert on April 15, 2020, at 0:34:41
In reply to Re: Would Dr Bob reveal personal information about us?, posted by rjlockhart37 on April 9, 2020, at 0:42:14
Alexandra,
I dont think authority figures are always good people.
Do you think it is good and ethical when a ruler decides about and exerts his power on individuals health data such as psychiatry phi (that consists of a lot of demographic information) and undermines your right of self-determination ?
I believe that people who posted here, especially also younger people and those people who have not known their rights should have had the right of self-determination.When something is online the HIPAA and other laws should guarantee the right of self-determination. If something offline it should be encrypted or secured. Other international laws are even more stringent.
I have not detailed knowledge of the laws in New Zealand but it seems that there is too a privacy law:
https://iapp.org/news/a/gdpr-matchup-new-zealands-privacy-act-1993/
Once the participants right of self-determination is not granted arent they exploited, especially also when money is generated ?
Furthermore the ruler infringes their copyrights.
The truth can get fairly distorted, because writing here could harm. Some people might find valuable information or they may also jump to false conclusions.
But that does not spare from the fact that the rights of the participants are undermined.I think therapists have other more reliable means to find and exchange information such as regular meetings or rounds...
poster:ert
thread:1109323
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20191229/msgs/1109619.html