Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: a refuge(e) board

Posted by Dr. Bob on July 7, 2013, at 15:47:52

In reply to Re: a refuge(e) board » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on July 6, 2013, at 12:12:38

> > one Refuge board, not all the boards being refuge boards.
>
> Then, no, absolutely not interested. That is a penalty or a punishment for preferring civility.
>
> 10derheart

> Unless, like Room 2 of chat, the refuge board was considered the main board, and this was the place people were directed after registration, I wouldn't much care for the idea.
>
> Dinah

Which board is the main board is in the eye of the beholder. I don't think people are directed to any one board after they register.

How much energy it takes me to battle posters' insistence gives me an idea of how much energy it takes them to battle Lou's insistence.

--

> It is ironic, but during your period of close moderation, people had very few fears of being hurt except for by the rigid sanctions administered by you.
>
> I can't believe you would open a new board dedicated to protect people from a single person
>
> Question: What kind of posting behavior would cause you to exercise a posting block?
>
> - Scott

> A new board because he can't place the same limits that have essentially been here for years on one poster?
>
> Wouldn't Lou just avoid that new board? And how would that address the issue? I care a lot more about what he says to others than what he says to me
>
> 10derheart

All posters who cared about what was said to them could choose to join the new board. People who are posting here would be welcome, and others would be welcome, too.

The catch before, which would be the catch again, would be that to make it feel safe(r) for some people, there would need to be sanctions for other people. And my bet is that it wouldn't just be one person who would be sanctioned.

If there's interest in a refuge board, we'd need to discuss what in fact would be sanctioned. What's come up so far:

> what I used to sanction
> posting something that might scare other posters
> nasty free-for-alls

--

> the idea ... makes me feel....like I'm being shuffled off to some padded room for annoying people
>
> 10derheart

To me, it sounds like a cushy room free from annoying people A refuge that helps people find strength. Like a nice massage can rejuvenate. I understand the appeal. Some people prefer the spa, others the gym, still others the spa one day, the gym the next. It's nice to have a choice.

--

> On the other hand, if Psychology should ever have life after death, I wouldn't mind at all for more strict rules on sensitivity to be applied there.
>
> Dinah

So at this point I count 1 vote for a new Refuge board and 1 for making Psychology a refuge board. Anybody else interested in a refuge board?

--

> many others leave because we let them down.
>
> Toph

> Psych is nearly dead, Social on life support...etc.
>
> 10derheart

Some people, "old" as well as "new", may feel disappointed that Psych and Social aren't more active. Does it take that much energy to keep posting on Psych and Social? What's the problem?

Let's make a deal. If I invest time and energy to moderate Babble, will you all invest time and energy to keep the boards alive and supportive?

Bob


a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1046456
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130702/msgs/1046701.html