Posted by Lou PIlder on April 3, 2013, at 10:25:24
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-735373, posted by Toph on April 3, 2013, at 9:14:06
> > I am unsure as to what you would like or not like readers of your post to think here...
> >
>
> I would like readers to think pretty much what I said Lou. To reiterate, when you imagine that Bob tolerates anti-semetic expression, in my mind it makes me think of the way he tolerates anti-pharmaceutical rhetoric here. The irony is self-evident.
>
> I personally believe that Bob is senstive and intolerant (maybe even overly so) of posts that might lead others to feel put down. I know that you perceive this injury to have occured to you because you remind us of it incessantly. In my experience, Bob does not try to fix issues he deems are misperceptions. So my advice to you is Lou -- get over it.
>
> Osessive and hyper-vigilant response to follow:Friends,
It is written here, [...obsessive and hyper-vigilant response to follow...].
Now the poster doesn't specify who the sub set of responders could be, but I am the subject person so I could be included in that set of responders.
Now the post in question that are allowed to stand that have the potential to arouse anti-Semitic feelings, could arouse anti-Semitic feeling to any Jew, not just me as a Jew here. For there are middle school students that could read here just as well as adults. Now they see what is plainly visible here and they can also see the anti-Semitic hatred posted against all Jews here, not just me. So I am here not only to save lives but to stop the members here and stop Mr Hsuing, from allowing anti-Semitic hatred to stand here. You see, when a psychiatrist has rules to not post anything that could lead one to feel put down/accused, and then allows Jews to be defamed openly here, then children could get the idea in their minds that anti-Semitism is condoned by not only Mr Hsiung, but by the members of this community since few are objecting to the allowing of the hate toward Jews to be posted. In fact, look at this post that I am responding to and could it not be seen by children that the poster that I am responding to states,[...I would like readers to think pretty much what I said...]. Well, look at what the poster said. And look at my questions to that poster that are outstanding.
It is generally agreed on that when one avoids answering questions, that the answers could then be incriminating to the one that is evasive. my questions to that poster, if answered, could go long way in stopping the anti-Semitism from be allowed to fan the flames of hatred toward the Jews here. Those flames could burn all Jews, not just me. And when an ignorant person about Jews take mind-altering drugs and sees the Hatred toward Jews being allowed to stand here, they not only could think that the hatred is justifiable, but they could think that they would be doing what is good by targeting a Jew for harm or even death. The tactics used by the (redacted by respondent) that resulted in 1 1/2 million Jewish children being subjected to atrocities and then murdered, are not that different than the tactics used against Jew here. And you that want the statements that can defame Jews to be allowed to continue to stand here as supportive and civil, then I say to you that in That Day, not only will you be given a chance to defend your position of allowing anti-Semitism to be considered to be civil and supportive as that you think that there is a {misperception} involving the posts in question here, but you will also be given
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1041099
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1041607.html