Posted by Lou Pilder on December 17, 2011, at 14:06:49
In reply to Lou's response-phohwndtshunphrumhey, posted by Lou Pilder on December 17, 2011, at 9:54:57
> > > > >
> > > > > "[Lou's response to aspects, Dec 15, 2006]
> > > > > There could be many but this one could come up first. It can be identified by that there is {64 Bowtie's post} in the subject line."
> > > > >
> > > > > I think I got blocked along about that time for trying to help you understand the dynamics involved when you ask people to read something that was written years ago and especially when you ask for opinions and judgments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lou, I would like to see you quit posting your requests for others to form opinions, etc. about the posts that happened years and years ago. I think that stopping it would be good for your health and the health of the forums, I cannot remember a time when this wasn't what you posted about. Personally, I've never read a post here that was antisemitic.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sometimes if we get out of our own heads and respond to another poster's feelings, it helps. I would really like to see you help other posters by listening.
> > > > >
> > > > > You and I have written many emails to one another and your emails have no relationship to how you post here. Try, Lou.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lou, I won't answer if you reply to this. I've been down that road before and I am officially burning my map.
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish you the best.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > It is written here,[...I've never read a post here that was antisemitic...].
> > > > That the member that wrote that has never seen a post here that is antisemitic does not mean that there are not posts here that are antisemitic, just because the member has never seen one.
> > > > A post that is antisemiti is one that could lead a Jew to feel put dow and/or accused when they read it. But that is not the only definition.
> > > > Lou
> > > > Here is a post that uses derogatory and dehumaniziing statements toward Jews. To see this post:
> > > > A. Go to the bottom of this page to the search box.
> > > > B. Type in:
> > > > [Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-, 6:47:49]
> > > > There will be many. This one has |Psycho-Babble in the subject line and is usually 3erd or 4th.
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > Here is a post that constitutes what is known as {anti-Judaism} which is theological antisemitism. The post defames the Jews as can be seen in #5 in a list written here in the 2end group of two groups as sen in the post.
> > > To see this post:
> > > A. Go to the botom of this page to the search box.
> > > B. Type in:
> > > [Re: a good battle,to foster any agenda, 21:41:14]
> > > If there is only one post, it could bring up the entire thread. The post in question is the 2end post in the list and to verify you will see two lists about the top ten. The part in question is in the 2end list as #5. The sttatement could be defaming to Jews and leads to part of what could be an indoctrination here as that Mr. Hsiung and his deputies can control the content here by either stateing that a statement is supportive or not or allowing a statement to stand without sanction. When a statement here is left unsanctioned, people can think that it is supportive because Mr. Hsiung says that support takes precendence and that he does what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole.
> > > Well, when people read this statement in question here, and they could be taking mind-altering drugs, then that could induce a mind-altered state for the taker of the drug(s) to be compelled to kill themselves and/or others. Now if they read the statement in question, then they could also get the (false) idea that they are superior to Jews and others that have their agenda in their religion not centerd on the claim in question here. This could then IMHO give rise to homocidal thinking to target a Jew for murder.
> >
> > Friends,
> > Here is a video that I would like for interested discussants to view.
> > To see this video.
> >
> > A. Pull up Google
> > B. Type in:
> > [Chruch History-Youtube]
> > you will see a pic of a man...posted on Oct 10 2008, timeis 9 min
>
> Friends,
> H3ere is another post.
> But first, I am requesting that you view the list in the following link and then actuate the post in question.
> Lou
> Here is the link:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010117/msgs/978777.html
> Then t ssee the post in question:
> A. Go to the bottom of this page and type in the search box:
> [in the bible]
> The post in question is usually the third post in that group and has the number 1062966 in it. In the third paragraph, it reads,[...made to suffer a horrible death {by them}...]correction:
the corrected post is usually the first post in the group and has the number,1002966, not 1062966
Lou
Now by the aspect that Mr. Hsiung writes here that he does not wait to sanction a post because one match could cause a forest fire, and that support takes precedence, then readers could think that the statement in question is supportive here. This then IMHO could lead to Jews being the victims of antisemitic violence by people that take mind-altering drugs that go into a mind-altered state induced by the drug(s) that could compel the taker of the drug to kill themselves and/or others or target a Jew for murder. People not taking mind-altering drugs that read what is in question here could also have their minds controlled in the direction to hate Jews and attack a Jew also because the site is chaired by a psychiatrist that he states that he does what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole. This could then lead some to think that statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings will be good for the community as a whole to be allowed to stand here.
My friends, this is not something new, but goes back thousands of years and could be found in midevil liturature that fosterd the Holocaust.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1000678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1005115.html