Posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2009, at 15:30:50
In reply to Lou's request of the 3-con post rule, posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2009, at 15:24:28
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I am requesting in relation to your TOS to discuss the rule for posting more than 3 consecutive posts here.
> If I was to know what you are wanting to mean, then I could follow the TOS for that rule. The following questions, if answered, could clarify the rule to me.
> A. What is meant here by {one at a time}?
> B. What is meant by {different posters}
> C. Do I have to follow the rule in a discussion between me and you here concerning adminiistartive issues?
> D. What are the criteria that you use to determine if a member is a less-confident member?
> E. If the rule is to accomodate that type of member, would not (redacted by poster)
> F. If more then 3 consecutive posts could provide education or support to some members, why would the rule trump, if it would, over support and education?
> G. other aspects not stated
> Lou Pilder
>
Friends,
If you are interwsted in this discussion, there is something new involved her concerning the rule here in question that I would like to discuss by email. If you could email me, then i thinkk that you could have a better understand of what is new about this and the potential ramifications IMO to the community concerning aspects of the rule.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:911953
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090813/msgs/911954.html