Posted by Lou PIlder on July 15, 2008, at 4:12:12
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Sigismund on July 11, 2008, at 15:36:11
> I don't understand any of this.
>
> Is Lou entitled to a response or not?Sigismund,
You wrote,[...don't understand...entitled to...?].
There is much more to this that I think could come into focus if other aspects of this situation here are brought out. In the following link that I am asking for members here interested in this discussion to click on, the concept of the notification system here that the deputies and Mr. Hsiung receive the notification is brought out. There is a confirmation that a member receives after they send a notifiacation. .
For a notification to be {missed}, one could have many things brought into mind with that language used for {missed} could be thought of in many ways. And if something is {missed] and Mr. Hsiung writes that {we've} missed it, then I do not have the infomation for me to know what Mr. Hsiung's statement means untill I have an understanding as to what {missed } means by him.
Here is the link to a previous situation .
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/736368.html
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:837613
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/839808.html