Posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:47:47
In reply to Lou's request to Robert Hsiung-corrected link, posted by Lou Pilder on February 25, 2008, at 16:24:04
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > I am requesting that you delete from your TOS the part that deputies, and yourself, can delete grossly inappropriate posts.
> > I base this in part on that you have posted that you do not delete all grossly inappropriate posts.(citation G2)
> > In a community that has the tOS to mean that there is an expectation for grossly inappropriate posts top be removed, and members ask for them to be deleted and you are unwilling to do so for any reason, then I feel that the confidence of the forum's administration could be lost. For if one part of the TOS is not being applied, then other parts IMO have the potential to also not be applied in a fair manner.
> > Since your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole, and be fair, then I am asking you to post here what rationale you have to allow you to leave grossly inapropriate posts on the board when your TOS says that deputies can delete them and then you repost it.
> > Lou PIlder
> > citation G2
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs625505.html
> corrected link
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060317/msgs/625505.htmlMr. Hsiung,
I am asking you to consider the content in the post (citation G3)
For there are members here that I think that your site has given them a declaration of allowing grossly inappropriate posts to be deleted by the nature of your TOS here. Your TOS to me could be an expectation that posts that are grossly inappropriate could be deleted. In post G3, what could in your thinking after reading that post, be good for the community as a whole to not delete any post that is grossly inappropriate?
Lou
citation G3
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/814591.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:814647
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080204/msgs/814652.html