Posted by Lou Pilder on July 21, 2007, at 7:52:50
In reply to Lou's reminder to DR. Hsiung-June 22-critgudfrwhol, posted by Lou Pilder on July 21, 2007, at 6:37:00
> Dr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, I had requested for policy clarification per your TOS, rules , rationales and actions that you have taken and such concerning what you posted here ,
> [...Perhaps before we post them (posts that seek clarification or guidance regarding site rules) we could ask ourselves whether doing so is likely to be productive and constructive {for the community as a whole}...].
> I am unsure as to what your statement;[...constructive and productive for the community as a whole...] could mean and have requested that you post an example here of posts that are or are not satisfying the criteria that your thinking uses to determine if or if not a statement is likely to be productive and constructive for the community as a whole.
> Here is a link to a post on June 22 by me to you concerning this request.
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070605/msgs/764902.htmlDR. Hsiung,
Continuing with my reminder about my request to you above, my request was spacific to:
A. Could you give more clarification as to what you could want your statement in question to mean as to your {posting examples} of posts that are or are not constructive and productive for the community as a whole that could show the criteria that your thinking uses to exemplify that.
In your post as a reply to me in that thread you wrote that you would like to hear from others.
I am unsure as to what you want to mean by that, for it is my understanding that you have posted that if one would like to know your rationale for something here or to discuss actions that you take and policy and such to just ask you here.
My requests then were;
A.[...could my request be of the nature to be responded by you without others giving their thinking?...]
B.[...I am requesting that {if} you are going to wait untill a member posts here so that you could either confirm or not, or not respond to the member's post at all, what they write as being what you mean, that I be allowed to post more than 3 consecutive posts...]
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here and there has been a post by another member on July 9 that wrote,[...lay out your treatise encompassing the twelve topics you detail....edify us....].
I would like to do that but in 3 posts I could not give all the detail that I would like for the membess to read. And I would like to add to the list;
15. Jesus of Nazareth
16. George Wallace
17. Jefferson Davis
18. David Duke
19. Mark Morford
20. John Grohol.
Here is a link to my requests concerning as to my wanting to know, for I am unsure, if you are wanting to mean that you will or will not reply to my requests for clarification or if you are wanting to mean that you will not reply to my requests untill someone else posts to the thread and there has been a member that posted that they would like for me to post the historical uses of ,[...good for the community as a whole...].
Lou PIlder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768424.html
here is the link to the post from a member
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768600.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:770853
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/770860.html