Posted by Lou PIlder on July 15, 2007, at 11:55:12
In reply to The original post by Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou PIlder on July 15, 2007, at 11:14:26
> > DR. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your reminder procedure, and to discuss actions that you take and ask for you rationale and such, I had requested clarification concerning statements by you that you have posted in regards to a post that IMO could have the potential to lead a Jew to feel put down. Your response that [...it is inevitible that one here could feel unsupported...] causes me concern as to what you want to mean by that, for the forum is for support and posts that are unsupportive are considered to be uncivil by you. This statement has jumped out at me because the goals of the forum are for support and I am trying to determine as to if there are two standards here or not which I could have a better idea about with the clarification that I have requested.
> > If I had the clarification that I have requested, I could respond accordingly to your statements here.
> > Here is the link to the post where I first asked you for some clarification concerning this on July 11.
> > Lou Pilder
> > http://dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768966.html
>
> DR. Hsiung,
> IN response to that you could like the original post of yours posted, here is the original post that has caused me to seek clarification from you as to what you want to mean by what you posted.
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20070227/msgs/768941.htmlFriends,
I am interested in hearing from other members here as to what their thinking could be about what Dr. Hsiung has posted. The thread is about that and if you would like to see the post of the member that has uinnitiated this thread in some way, you could email me if you like.
Dr. Hsiung writes,
[...I don't consider it civil to post {anything} that {could lead others} to feel put down....Still, I think that it is inevitable that particular posters sometimes won't feel supported by particular posts...]
Dr. Hsiung's post is in response to another post that I could email you if you like.
If you could post your response here to what your thinking could be here, I would appreciate it. I am asking you to keep in mind that it might be necessary to have an understanding of how statements have been used for centuries that have led to the suffereing and death of millions of Jews and that these statements have the potential IMO to have arrouse antisemitic feelings and have the potential IMO to lead a Jew to feel accused and/or put down. These statements are recognized in world courts and are in volumes of publications as those statements that purport accusations toward the Jews and the promulgation of what is known as replacement theology.
My friends, the people of my faith and I believe that the Love of God does not exclude the Jews as purported in some doctrins of {replacement theology}. If you would want to know more about replacement theology without doing a search, you could email me for some particular expositions that are recognized as authoritative on the subject.
Lou Pilder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:769645
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/769680.html