Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2007, at 14:58:23
In reply to Re: consistency, posted by Dr. Bob on July 6, 2007, at 14:31:52
> > I think zen's original monster block was for allegedly speaking disparagingly of Bob ... But relative to recent examples of speaking disparagingly of Bob that went unadmonished, does not seem remotely equitable or consistent.
> >
> > confuzyq
>
> It can be hard to compare different examples, because the posters, the contexts, and the policies in effect may be different, too...
>
> BobI'm very curious about the exact reason that Zen was blocked? I just didn't understand the part about the "slate"...
I didn't understand why she was blocked for the one question that she posted when others who posted above her were the ones who started and finished the fray.
I would really appreciate a more detailed explanation concerning her block. Thank you, Fayeroep.s. In no way was I speaking disparagingly about other posters here when I posted about Zen. I believe that the posters who read Administration understood why I posted that.
I apologize if any poster felt "put down" by my statements. I know Zen personally and feel very strongly about her presence here.
poster:fayeroe
thread:767523
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/768097.html