Posted by Lou Pilder on September 18, 2006, at 8:29:27
Dr. Hsiung,
You have made rules that prohibit the posting of a post for your determination as to if it is acceptable or not in relation to the guidlines of the forum. Coupled with this, you have made a rule that prohibits emailing you for asking you for a determination if the poster is one that one has emailed you about 3 other posts from the same poster if you determined that those were acceptable.
This leads to the situation if there is a post that I, or anyone else, would like for you to make a determination about and the poster is one that has been requested for you to examine 3 of the poster's posts in the past and you have said that those were acceptable.
I ask if there could be an exception to your rules for asking you by email in relation to those posters that you say I can not ask you about their posts:
A. If the post in question has the potential, IMO, to foster belittlement toward me, could I ask you to make a determinatin as to its acceptablity?
B. If the post has the potential,IMO, to foster ridicule of me, could I ask you to make a determination?
C. If the post has the potential to be accusitive,IMO, could I ask you to make a determination?
D. If the post has the potential, IMO, to arrouse antisemitic feelings, could I ask you to make a determination?
E. If the post shows that in the past practice you have ruled that in the past it was not acceptable, could I ask you to make a determination?
F. If the post has the potential,IMO, to foster defamation toward me if it is not sanctioned, could I ask you to make a determination?
G. If the post has the potential,IMO, to be manufacturing a falsehood about me, could I ask you to make a determination?
For those that could be interested in this in more detail, I could email with you if you like about this.
Lou Pilder
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:687043
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/687043.html