Posted by James K on August 16, 2006, at 16:12:44
In reply to Lou's reply to James K » James K, posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2006, at 15:58:52
> The issue IMO is that {if the statement is left unsanctioned}, there is the potential for others to be led to think that the administration endorses what was posted. If that happens then there is also the potential for Jews as I am, to feel defamed, and then if the statement is not sanctioned, there is the potential IMO for what was posted to be fostered.
--- Do you believe that I shouldn't be allowed here, or anywhere? to make the statement that the story of Jesus Christ as told in the Bible references that the Jewish leaders had Jesus crucified after the Roman leader was willing to let him go?You may be right about here. At the top of the faith board, it says that support may mean not posting about some aspects of a religious belief. That would be a fair determination for here. I'm open to it.
It may be that aspect of Christianity can't be discussed here for reasons that it might bother a Jew. It won't change the fact that, punishing all Jews for it is antisemitic, and that nothing in my parents' doctrine says that Jews are responsible and should be punished. Just that that year's leaders of the church were corrupt.
It is however a "fact" if you believe the bible is true. I don't.
If it is some other aspect of the post that is problematic, what is it?
James K
poster:James K
thread:677026
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/677158.html