Posted by Lou Pilder on June 7, 2005, at 11:16:46
In reply to Re: so's request, posted by Dr. Bob on June 7, 2005, at 1:45:32
> > > > > > Is it possible people whose career is to lock people in jail for possessing marijuana contrary to the law could feel put down upon reading such posts? Also, since the majority of legislators in each of the 50 United States, and the majority of Congressional representatives publicly favor current drug laws, could they or their constituents possibly feel put down to read that their legally adopted policies are "hypocricy at it's worst"?
> > > > >
> > > > > It's possible. Do you feel put down upon reading them?
> > > >
> > > > Do I need to show evidence that I was injured
> > >
> > > No, it would be enough simply to claim that you were.
> >
> > I do hereby claim that I feel injured when I notice that you selectively enforce policies
>
> How about when you read those posts?
>
> Bob
Dr. Hsiung,
In your reply to the poster, "so",[...how about...], do you mean any of the following?
A."so" could feel injured without reading the posts in question and you need to know if "so" read them before you can reply to her previous requests to you.
B. "So" feels injured because of her/his perception that you selectivly enforce policies here and you want to know if the "selective enforcment" that he/she writes as feeling injured by was felt without reading the posts.
C. You asked the question above because you think that there could be a difference between {noticing} and {reading} a post and you want to have that clarified.
D. You asked "so" the question above for reasons that have nothing to do with choices A, B, and C and you will explain what your reason is.
E. same as "D", but you will not explaine your reason for asking "so".[...how about when you read...?].
F. none of the above
G. a combination of the above
H.all of the above
K. something else
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:507180
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050530/msgs/509050.html