Posted by Lou Pilder on December 15, 2004, at 14:44:56
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on December 15, 2004, at 13:37:50
Dr. Hsiujg,
One of my concerns about our discussion is that if something has been determined to be unsupportive here, like statements that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, and you have written to not post those type of statements even if you are quoting someone else because you write that statements of that nature are considered to be unsupportive, then in my opinion, the {mode} used to display the potential unsupportive statement could be not relevant to it being unsupportive. For IMO, the mode does not change the content or its meaning and I believe that there is the potential for one to think that also because of what you have written as to [...even if you are quoting someone else...] in the link in the above post. I believe that if it is written something that has the potential for others to consider that the statment says that jews are filthy and full of abominations or that the jews killed Christ, to be unsupportive in any mode, be it from the poster him/her self, or if the poster offers a link to their church's bible verse that say that. I feel that when that is done,that there is the potential for some to consider that since they are posting their church's doctrins,and if they are posting that they are a member of that church, then could it not be that there is the potential to consider that they are endorsing such themselvs? You have posted links by various mental health professionals here and I feel that you are endorsing what is written by them in the link that you provide. The overiding issue here in this situation with me, and maybe not with others, is that I believe and it is my opinion that the potential is there for one to consider that the method that you are using in this particular case in question could have some to, IMO, think that the statements that have the potential IMO to arrouse antisemitic feelings is less of a civility issue than, lets say, using a word that means a donkey, for posters that use that word have been evicted from the forum and the poster in question has in 6 or so occasions been asked to revise the post without there being a mention by you as to the civility of the statement in the subject line.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:429941
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/429965.html