Posted by Ame Sans Vie on August 22, 2003, at 16:34:09
In reply to Re: blocked for 6 weeks » paxvox, posted by Dr. Bob on August 22, 2003, at 15:51:18
I do have to say that I agree with Paxvox's idea to implement a separate board (perhaps only accesible via a special password so as to preserve anonimity and make it more of a "secret ballot") and appoint a dozen or so posters with good civility records to have access to said board. However, I have one revision to this idea. I feel that allowing the "civility jury" to make a judgment on a post before you get the chance to may slow down the moderating process. Therefore, I suggest that this "jury" be implemented solely for the purpose of judging the civility or incivility of a post only *after* you have taken your action. Then, if you think the arguments and ultimate judgments presented on the board are good, you might reconsider your initial reaction to the post. Of course, you would still have the final word. What do you think?
poster:Ame Sans Vie
thread:252797
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030808/msgs/253199.html