Posted by Vincent_QC on February 10, 2009, at 11:16:37
In reply to Re: Nardil did change » djmmm, posted by Chihuahua on February 4, 2009, at 19:47:51
That's a topic that I used often here...the new formulation of the Nardil. It's one of my oldest post on the psycho-babble, I given the link the the website where you can find informations about the reformulation of the Nardil and some comparaisons about the newer Canadian version VS the USA version and the OLD GOOD nardil version.
I also post some links about studies comparing the newer nardil VS the old nardil and also one studie about the Canadian newer version VS the USA newer version of the Nardil... Just use the search option here and Nardil new formulation and you will see...
I'm sure the new Nardil is not working as good as the old one...more than 70 000 people around the world use it before the reformulation in 2003...I wonder how many people had to switch for something else like Marplan or Parnate???
One thing is sure, ERFA is the compagny in the Canada who produce the newer Nardil...the Canadian Nardil seem to be more stable than the USA ones...I ask my pharmacist and he said that ERFA never recall batch or lot of defect Nardil from Erfa...but in the States, it's seem to occur often...The UK Nardil and the Australian one seem also to be more good than both Canadian and USA version...
I don't think we will see the good old version of the Nardil again...the market of the AD's drugs is very limited for the MAOI's, even if we see newer products like the EMSAM patch. In fact, nobodies seem to care and ask about WHY the compagny who developp the EMSAM patch decide to use the Selegiline and not the phenelzine (Nardil active ingredient)...it will be a more usefull product...but well...who can afford to paid 500$ a month for 30 small patch ???? Nobodies...
poster:Vincent_QC
thread:877613
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090203/msgs/879236.html