selegiline response rate » Tye

Posted by Elizabeth on April 4, 2002, at 22:37:39

In reply to That is incorrect Dr. Kramer, posted by Tye on April 2, 2002, at 20:20:07

> Actually the rate of response of the subjects enrolled in the selegiline patch study was approximately 75%.
My recollection is that there were different sites. Was this the response rate at one of these sites, or the combined response at all the sites?
I think it's well established that selegiline is an effective antidepressant in the higher dose range. The only possible reason why the patch might not work would be that it didn't deliver the drug effectively.
The whole thing seems damned peculiar to me.
-elizabeth

Thread

Kramer: reason the MAOI patch was rejected? OldSchool 4/2/02
Re: Kramer: reason the MAOI patch was rejected? Dr. Kramer 4/2/02
That is incorrect Dr. Kramer Tye 4/2/02
Re: That is incorrect Dr. Kramer OldSchool 4/2/02
Re: Kramer: reason the MAOI patch was rejected? OldSchool 4/2/02
selegiline response rate » Tye Elizabeth 4/4/02

Post a new follow-up

[101892]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Elizabeth thread:101404
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20020402/msgs/101892.html

	for
in