![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by alexandra_k on June 30, 2021, at 22:27:01
we don't like it when you talk to us.
we don't like it when you talk.you put in a perfectly good application for a $5,000 scholarship to do a 1 year philosophy research project on disability and equity in medicine and public health.
we chose to say your proposal was sub-standard which was why we refused to give you the scholarship.
the scholarship was a $5,000 payment and there was a requirement that a talk be given to the district health board.
that is to say if they had have selected me for the scholarship (if they had have paid it out to anybody at all) then they would have had the opportunity to hear my work in it's formative stages.
to have questioned me / taken me to task.
to have informed me.
to have responded to me.
to have engaged with me.
but they chose not to listen. they chose not to engage when it was formative. tehy chose not to hear anything i had to say (even when they had opportunity for questions).
they opted out.
so i completed it without them. and they were required to allow it to go to external examiners.
and external examiners wanted changes to the substance. and i did the changes they required.
and the DHB and the university were required to allow the externals to sign me off.
i talk to them like they are retarded psychopaths becuase they do not listen when i talk
they do not allow me to talk
urf
is all i have to say to them
'get out of it ya mongrel'
Posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:37:00
In reply to we don't like it when you talk to us like that..., posted by alexandra_k on June 30, 2021, at 22:27:01
So we are in group 3 vaccine roll-out.
Invitations to over 65s and people with pre-existing health conditions that makes it important that they be vaccinated sooner rather than later.
But a lot of young adults are being sent inviations -- and they don't understand why.
Apparently it is because if you had asthma as a kid (but grew out of it) your general practitioner still records that you have asthma. so they get more money for having you because you have asthma. see?
So now all these people are finding out that their GPs have been billing / claiming funds for them in a manner or way that is fraudulent. Or something like fraudulent. From a natural justice perspective.
You can't get off the health register, etiher. You can only go from one HPO to another. You can't say 'stop billing for me altogether. You are not my HPO anymore'. They won't.
That's why 'privacy' means (has been interpreted in NZ) as being privacy for the clinics and the doctors owning the records. The patients don't have access. If they did they would see all the lies and falsehoods. All the garbage garbage garbage.
That's how come the system got hacked. Patient data made widely available on the dark web or whatever. People might actually see their notes and go:
wtf???
and realise we don't have a health system.
Posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:39:05
In reply to HPO claiming group 3 funding for their populations, posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:37:00
because he didn't apply for funding.
because his application was received late.
because he wanted to put people without clearance to work with children in positions where they were working with children.because
because
because
because
becausethe ministry of health will ONLY HIRE murderers and rapists and sexual violators and people to tell the little kiddies to beat themselves up for their repeated harms and violations and to be good little victims and so on and so forth...
the f*ck*ng psychopaths.
Posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:40:22
In reply to mike king's charity didn't get funded because..., posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:39:05
there's no money for counsellors because once people like leeks have allllllll the money to abuse the kiddies there's nothing left. apparently. once you've paid the ministry of health workers to refuse to supply applications to refuse to process applications to refuse to hire or fund things that are good fro the people (only)...
there's nothing left.
Posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:53:29
In reply to Re: mike king's charity didn't get funded because..., posted by alexandra_k on July 1, 2021, at 17:40:22
why is it that the nz government reckons that more of it's people will comply with government directive to get a vaccination than any other developed nation...
and that somehow...
this 'world leader in compliance' thing illustrates or indicates something *desirable*?
?
?
why is it a good thing to have a compliant population?
i mean...
it gets me thinking 'the government doesn't know what voluntary means. it is saying that the 20 per cent or whatever it is getting are... basically being bullied or conned or...'
what is it? what is the special sauce that makes the nz population so compliant?
could it be that the people trust the government? does it seem likely? people are complaining tha they are not being heard and they are not being listened to left right and centre. the adverse event reporting shows people do not trust the health system and we are not happy we don't have accesst o the medications and procedures and treatments that are routinely performed in other developed nations. we are not happy about any of that at all.
so there's nothing in the vicinity of trust in our health system to account for a higher than usual or standard or typical uptake okf vaccine.
maybe our people are better educated and are making better informed decisions when it comes to trusting the science and research that has gone into things. let's just suppose that better education could result in increased uptake. seems plausible. now lets look at our under-performing education system and how poorly we are doing on international standards of literacy and numberacy and so on. doesn't seem plausible that that's responsible then, does it.
so what is it? what is it that...forces?
the new zealand people to comply with what chris hipkins has decided is right for you.
oh mighty government who didn't believe in airborne tranmission or face masks (they aren't 100 percent effective therefore they are useless) or... there being any treatment at all for viral infections (if you have cold or flu like symptoms just stay home people don't go to the doctor they will say awwwwwwwww there there feel better it's probably a virus therefore there is no medication no treatment for you).
why does the government think it reflects well on it that it plans to force compliance rates higher than those of developed nations with rule of law?
they don't have teh capacity to grasp the ideology...
____
there is a small group of maaori leaders. of the 'city mission has given us food to distribute to our people' variety.
they are goign to get together and yakkity yak yak yak yak about what they want and what their aspirations and goals and so on and so forth are. their aspirations and goals to stay in charge of the food supply to their people. to keep earning what they are earning and making all the decisiosn on the behalf of their people.
and they are going to do that in the name of the rights of indigenous people.
they wouldn't pass a multi guess quiz on what the document that was signed up to says.
because they didn't sign it. they reckon. therefore it is not binding on them.
and they aren't going to read it.
because they are in the process of writing their own document of the demands of what they must have otherwise... they will withhhold even more from their people - hostages.
because maaori leaders have the same rights as everybody else to keep slaves etc.
of course.
yeah.
that's it.
they nailed it.
you see why the government keeps these ones on. right? the leaders who deny the rights of their people.
i don't know they have the capacity to understand them.
at the start of my thesis in 2018 the nz government commissioned a page on 'equity' where the people they commissioned to wouldn't have been capable of passing a reading comprehension multiple choice quiz on what the UN was saying.
this inability to go: 'wow. a lot of really smart people have contributed to this. i genuinely cannot think of anything that hasn't been included in the document already. and given that... what are you working on now? what is in it's infantile stages? maybe i can contribute to that...'
no.
it would be like if they insisted on not giving their people computers until they developed the capacity to make them themselves.
they aren't doing so well with the written language.
because traditional thinking is iconographic.
and there wasn't trade or whatever developed to keep track of numbers of anything... not that the leaders have allowed or acknowledged or kept record of... not insofar as i can see...
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.