![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 16 of 16. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2013, at 10:03:39
Mr Hsiung and his deputy,
IN regards to your reminder policy, there are two more outstanding notifications fom me.
Lou Pilder
Posted by rjlockhart37 on February 17, 2013, at 13:49:08
In reply to Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2013, at 10:03:39
lou 2 outstanding notifactions.....you should give a tip....2 pennies...now im gonna be look forward from gettin 2 pennies from you....ill be so rich i can live under a umbrella over my head...
Lou how about a system called Lou Alert...
Lousy
Posted by schleprock on February 17, 2013, at 22:54:43
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by rjlockhart37 on February 17, 2013, at 13:49:08
> lou 2 outstanding notifactions.....you should give a tip....2 pennies...now im gonna be look forward from gettin 2 pennies from you....ill be so rich i can live under a umbrella over my head...
>
> Lou how about a system called Lou Alert...
>
> LousyWhy is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 18, 2013, at 7:21:03
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by schleprock on February 17, 2013, at 22:54:43
> > lou 2 outstanding notifactions.....you should give a tip....2 pennies...now im gonna be look forward from gettin 2 pennies from you....ill be so rich i can live under a umbrella over my head...
> >
> > Lou how about a system called Lou Alert...
> >
> > Lousy
>
> Why is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?schleprock,
To answer your question, one could see it in different perspectives. One perspective is that there are reminders from me to Mr Hsiung that since the requests/notifications have not been responded to in relation to Mr Hsiung's TOS, there becomes posts that keep the original requests on the board. Now then if my requests were acted on by Mr Hsiung/his deputy, then the requests could be archived and the percentage of the posts that are mine would be less, for no reminder would be posted. It is conceiveable that if bystanders here posted in the threads where my requests are outstanding, that my requests could be resolved by the nature that Mr Hsiung would see that my requests are not a one-person issue and act accordingly to end the reminders.
Now even if there is bystander apathy to my requests, that does not lessen the consequences that could arise out of the fact that the requests from me to Mr Hsiung remain outstanding. If you read the requests from me, you could see that many involve the aspect that the unresolved issues could induce antisemitic violence and anti other violence by the nature that antisemitic statemnts are allowed to stand and insults to Judaism and Islam and other faiths are allowed to stand and posts that could arouse hatred toward me are allowed to stand. The fact that Mr Hsiung states that support takes precedence and that anything that could lead a Jew or others to feel put down/accused should not be posted here, is allowed to stand, could lead a subset of people that read here to use a Jew or the others as an outlet for their hatred toward Jews and the others and seek out to use a Jew or the others as a target to murder. This could lead those that take mind-altering drugs to think that while they are in a compelled mind-altered state as a result of these drugs to seek out even elementery school children to kill in a drug-induced hatred toward Jews and others in a mass-murder shooting rampage. The fact that they can have homocidal thinking increased by the drugs can compel them to murder anyone, for psychologists have written that when hate is induced in the person's mind that takes mind-altering drugs, that the hate could be projectd toward those that that are led to believe (falsely) that Jews and the others that are allowed to be defamed here, to be inferior, hence the person in the mind-altered state from the drugs could feel superior to those that they target for murder. The hate could then be projected to any and all humanity, and indiscriminate mass-murder could occupy the minds of those taking these drugs that even the FDA has posted a black-box warning that suicidal thinking can be increased by the drugs. They could go into schools, ino theaters,with their hate, they could kill their own children and their own mothers.
And the bystander apathy is plainly visible here. Not only that, but there are posts where Mr Hsiung is in concert with members in relation to using an epithet toward me which could encourage members to post here hatred toward me and posts that could arouse antisemitic feelings.
Now when children in high school look into this site, they could think that all of that is "supportive" and think that since a psychiatrists leaves the statements that could arouse antisemitic feeling to stand, that antisemitism could be thought to be supportive. And they can see that the member's apathy here on the admin board could also be thought by some to be "supportive". That could lead to those thinking that to target a Jew and the others defamed here for murder. And you want to know why 75% of the posts on this board are from me trying to stop the hate posted here toward me and toward Jews and others? I ask you why is there the low percenatage of members posting in the threads where my requests to Mr Hsiung ar outstanding?
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on February 18, 2013, at 9:36:24
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by schleprock on February 17, 2013, at 22:54:43
Cause Dr Bob is posting on social. Phillipa
Posted by CamW on February 18, 2013, at 20:35:36
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by schleprock on February 17, 2013, at 22:54:43
> Why is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?
I think that it has something to do with attention-seeking behaviour.
BTW, people picking on Lou has nothing to do with antisemitism, but more with Lou's egocentric behaviour & perhaps a persecution problem.
I seem to remember that much of Lou's early writing was based upon the New Testament (Revelations, I believe), but I return & he is now a Jew. Hmm...
- Cam
Posted by SLS on February 19, 2013, at 6:22:44
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor » schleprock, posted by CamW on February 18, 2013, at 20:35:36
> > Why is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?
>
> I think that it has something to do with attention-seeking behaviour.
>
> BTW, people picking on Lou has nothing to do with antisemitism, but more with Lou's egocentric behaviour & perhaps a persecution problem.
>
> I seem to remember that much of Lou's early writing was based upon the New Testament (Revelations, I believe), but I return & he is now a Jew. Hmm...
This is not directed towards anyone in particular. It is really more of a reminder to me:I don't think it is very civil - and certainly not productive - to talk about Lou Pilder in ways that ridicule him or his behavior. We should probably avoid the temptation to develop theories of mind to explain him. This certainly doesn't mean that we should avoid challenging him intellectually. I find that Lou Pilder only rarely engages in debate. I have therefore focused on offering to readers alternative explanations and perspectives to counter those promulgated by Mr. Pilder. I try to challenge him directly rather than speak about him in the third person.
Sometimes, silence is the most persuasive argument.
We are, of course, giving Mr. Pilder quite a bit of attention by talking about him in this thread.
Hi, Lou!
- Scott
Posted by CamW on February 19, 2013, at 7:52:29
In reply to Scott's Reminder., posted by SLS on February 19, 2013, at 6:22:44
Thanks Scott.
I just deleted a very long post on this matter.
I will email you with some questions & concerns to get your opinion.
After a decade, silence is no longer an option.
- Cam
Posted by CamW on February 19, 2013, at 9:11:43
In reply to Scott's Reminder., posted by SLS on February 19, 2013, at 6:22:44
On second thought Scott, you are correct. This is not my battle to fight.
Sorry, Cam
Posted by SLS on February 19, 2013, at 12:51:56
In reply to Re: Scott's Reminder. » SLS, posted by CamW on February 19, 2013, at 9:11:43
> On second thought Scott, you are correct. This is not my battle to fight.
Of course it is, Cam. If any and all statements made by posters were to remain unchallenged, how would that affect the health of the individual and the viability of the community? I try to choose my battles strategically so as to remain focused and conserve time and energy. I have discovered that with some people, it is not necessary nor desirable to contest every word written.
A poster recently asserted that an individual does not have to read his posts if they don't want to. However, this does not give him license to write anything he wants. After all, no one really has to read the words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau if they don't want to, right?
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 19, 2013, at 19:39:33
In reply to Re: Lo's reminder-tewmhoor » schleprock, posted by CamW on February 18, 2013, at 20:35:36
> > Why is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?
>
> I think that it has something to do with attention-seeking behaviour.
>
> BTW, people picking on Lou has nothing to do with antisemitism, but more with Lou's egocentric behaviour & perhaps a persecution problem.
>
> I seem to remember that much of Lou's early writing was based upon the New Testament (Revelations, I believe), but I return & he is now a Jew. Hmm...
>
> - Cam
>Friends,
It is written here,[...I return & he is a Jew.Hmm...].
The author writes that after he wrote that he saw some of my posts from years ago that could have content that could be in the book called Revelaton.
One deduction that could be made here is that there is a question as to who is Jew.
It has been revealed to me as to who is a Jew First, the Rider on the white horse is not Christiandom's Jesus. The Rider was there in the beginning of creation. The Rider has been here all the time. And He is The Word of God, the logos, the intelligence of the God that the Jews give service and worship to. This logos can appear today. This word could become flesh and dwell among us. And as to who is a Jew I was told by the Rider when He said to me, "A Jew is one that is a Jew inwardly, for I am a Jew. And whosoever shall do the will of my father in heaven, the same is my brother and sister. For there is no Jew or non-Jew. There is no male or female. There is no rich man or poor man, for we are all one in the Spirit of God. And many in That Day will say that they were this or that. And I will say to them to be (redacted by respondent) those that did iniquity."
Lou
Posted by schleprock on February 19, 2013, at 20:41:14
In reply to Lou's response-huiz, posted by Lou Pilder on February 19, 2013, at 19:39:33
> > > Why is 70% of the admin. board comprised of posts from Lou Pilder?
> >
> > I think that it has something to do with attention-seeking behaviour.
> >
> > BTW, people picking on Lou has nothing to do with antisemitism, but more with Lou's egocentric behaviour & perhaps a persecution problem.
> >
> > I seem to remember that much of Lou's early writing was based upon the New Testament (Revelations, I believe), but I return & he is now a Jew. Hmm...
> >
> > - Cam
> >
>
> Friends,
> It is written here,[...I return & he is a Jew.Hmm...].
> The author writes that after he wrote that he saw some of my posts from years ago that could have content that could be in the book called Revelaton.
> One deduction that could be made here is that there is a question as to who is Jew.
> It has been revealed to me as to who is a Jew First, the Rider on the white horse is not Christiandom's Jesus. The Rider was there in the beginning of creation. The Rider has been here all the time. And He is The Word of God, the logos, the intelligence of the God that the Jews give service and worship to. This logos can appear today. This word could become flesh and dwell among us. And as to who is a Jew I was told by the Rider when He said to me, "A Jew is one that is a Jew inwardly, for I am a Jew. And whosoever shall do the will of my father in heaven, the same is my brother and sister. For there is no Jew or non-Jew. There is no male or female. There is no rich man or poor man, for we are all one in the Spirit of God. And many in That Day will say that they were this or that. And I will say to them to be (redacted by respondent) those that did iniquity."
> Lou
>
>Why does the Rider need a horse?
Posted by CamW on February 20, 2013, at 11:10:17
In reply to Re: Scott's Reminder. » CamW, posted by SLS on February 19, 2013, at 12:51:56
> > On second thought Scott, you are correct. This is not my battle to fight.
>
> Of course it is, Cam. If any and all statements made by posters were to remain unchallenged, how would that affect the health of the individual and the viability of the community? I try to choose my battles strategically so as to remain focused and conserve time and energy. I have discovered that with some people, it is not necessary nor desirable to contest every word written.
>
> A poster recently asserted that an individual does not have to read his posts if they don't want to. However, this does not give him license to write anything he wants. After all, no one really has to read the words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau if they don't want to, right?
>
>
> - ScottScott - After my time with mental health, I kinda lost it. But one cannot go from reading 10+ journal articles daily to doing nothing. I started studying textual criticism of the bible (yes, including trying to learn some ancient Greek... that is another story). I now own close to 100 scholarly texts on the subject (found a used bookstore that specializes) & have studied them all.
Anyway, going through some posts that I missed while away from this site, I found some glaring errors by a poster.
Unfortunately, for all of us, it is best if I stick to psychopharmacology.
Re: Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Didn't he lose his just before the French Revolution? He was a Calvinist Freemason who believed the myth of the "Noble Savage". Read his "Discourse on Inequality" a while back, but it didn't leave much of an impression, but I see what you mean.
Thanks Scott - Cam
Posted by Lou PIlder on February 21, 2013, at 21:11:46
In reply to Re: Scott's Reminder. » SLS, posted by CamW on February 20, 2013, at 11:10:17
> > > On second thought Scott, you are correct. This is not my battle to fight.
> >
> > Of course it is, Cam. If any and all statements made by posters were to remain unchallenged, how would that affect the health of the individual and the viability of the community? I try to choose my battles strategically so as to remain focused and conserve time and energy. I have discovered that with some people, it is not necessary nor desirable to contest every word written.
> >
> > A poster recently asserted that an individual does not have to read his posts if they don't want to. However, this does not give him license to write anything he wants. After all, no one really has to read the words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau if they don't want to, right?
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott - After my time with mental health, I kinda lost it. But one cannot go from reading 10+ journal articles daily to doing nothing. I started studying textual criticism of the bible (yes, including trying to learn some ancient Greek... that is another story). I now own close to 100 scholarly texts on the subject (found a used bookstore that specializes) & have studied them all.
>
> Anyway, going through some posts that I missed while away from this site, I found some glaring errors by a poster.
>
> Unfortunately, for all of us, it is best if I stick to psychopharmacology.
>
> Re: Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Didn't he lose his just before the French Revolution? He was a Calvinist Freemason who believed the myth of the "Noble Savage". Read his "Discourse on Inequality" a while back, but it didn't leave much of an impression, but I see what you mean.
>
> Thanks Scott - CamC,
I am unsure as to what ou are identifying in what you wrote above. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have te opprotunity to respond accordingly.
A. In that you wrote that you read 10+ journal articles daily and that you started reading textual criticisms of the bible and that you own close to 100 scholerly texts on the subject,
1. Are the 10+ journal articles that you read daily the same as the textual criticisms of the bible?
2.in that you own close to 100 scholerly texts on the subject, what is the subject(s)?
3. What is a textual criticism?
B. In that you read posts in the archives and you say you have found errors by a poster,
1.who is the poster?
2. What are the errors
3. Why are they errors?
C. Why is it unfortuant if you stick to pharmacology and that it is for {all} of us and why is it {best}?
D. In your statement concerning JJ Rousseau, what is it that you see as to that you wrote, [...I see what you mean...]?
Lou
Posted by rjlockhart37 on March 7, 2013, at 17:33:01
In reply to Lou's request-whtduzhepsee? » CamW, posted by Lou PIlder on February 21, 2013, at 21:11:46
Lou big mama called me....she wants you at her house at 10pm in the bathroom....
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 4, 2013, at 8:23:01
In reply to Lo's reminder-tewmhoor, posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2013, at 10:03:39
> Mr Hsiung and his deputy,
> IN regards to your reminder policy, there are two more outstanding notifications fom me.
> Lou PilderMr Hsiung,
In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above.
You say that it may be good for the community to see that my posts do not have to be responded to. Why is that?
Lou PIlder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1044219.html
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.