Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 968430

Shown: posts 1 to 11 of 11. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Re: blocked for 52 weeks

Posted by Dr. Bob on November 4, 2010, at 15:53:56

In reply to Re: blocked for 26 weeks » bulldog2, posted by Dr. Bob on October 4, 2010, at 4:39:50

> block length = 25.52 rounded = 26 weeks

doubled = 52 weeks

If someone tries to get around being blocked by posting as someone else, I block the other posting name and extend the duration of the original block:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce

Bob

 

Re: blocked for 52 weeks

Posted by odon on November 4, 2010, at 15:53:57

In reply to Re: blocked for 52 weeks, posted by Dr. Bob on November 2, 2010, at 17:58:21

Who did you block for 52 weeks now?Maybe you should be called Dr. Block.

 

Is 52 weeks a new record? (nm)

Posted by ron1953 on November 4, 2010, at 16:10:03

In reply to Re: blocked for 52 weeks, posted by Dr. Bob on November 4, 2010, at 15:53:56

 

Re: blocked for 52 weeks » odon

Posted by sigismund on November 4, 2010, at 16:12:53

In reply to Re: blocked for 52 weeks, posted by odon on November 4, 2010, at 15:53:57

Now I'm confused.

I thought he blocked you.

 

Re: blocked for 52 weeks » sigismund

Posted by ron1953 on November 4, 2010, at 16:15:39

In reply to Re: blocked for 52 weeks » odon, posted by sigismund on November 4, 2010, at 16:12:53

Not yet......wait a minute

 

Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?

Posted by muffled on November 4, 2010, at 16:48:49

In reply to Is 52 weeks a new record? (nm), posted by ron1953 on November 4, 2010, at 16:10:03

Naw Alex has him beat by a mile...

 

Re: blocked for 52 weeks

Posted by odon on November 4, 2010, at 17:26:36

In reply to Re: blocked for 52 weeks » odon, posted by sigismund on November 4, 2010, at 16:12:53

I could care less one way or the other if he banned me.It's ok Dr Bob or whoever writes for you on occasion.You can ban me I give you permission to do so.

 

Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?

Posted by odon on November 4, 2010, at 17:38:37

In reply to Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?, posted by muffled on November 4, 2010, at 16:48:49

Maybe Dr Block is going to introduce the 104 week ban,afterall he's in the New York times now.LOL!

 

Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?

Posted by alexandra_k on November 5, 2010, at 5:10:57

In reply to Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?, posted by odon on November 4, 2010, at 17:38:37

They max at one year so that makes first equal. Not sure how many of us are there / have been there.

Sorry blocked poster... Whoever you were mostly known as.

Take care.

 

Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?

Posted by sigismund on November 5, 2010, at 14:15:17

In reply to Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?, posted by alexandra_k on November 5, 2010, at 5:10:57

The thing is, when the poster comes back after 52 weeks that poster is so carefully watched, so easily given a new PBC, and then a new 52 weeker.

 

Re: Is 52 weeks a new record? » sigismund

Posted by alexandra_k on November 5, 2010, at 22:06:43

In reply to Re: Is 52 weeks a new record?, posted by sigismund on November 5, 2010, at 14:15:17

Yeppers. Thats what makes coming back here so inviting (not).


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.