![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 19 to 43 of 81. Go back in thread:
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 14:37:02
In reply to WHAT?!?! I can not believe this...., posted by spriggy on August 6, 2005, at 12:42:12
> somebody doesn't understood my booger thread?
>
> ROFL
>
> *confused look*Spriggy, you're too much
Ah spriggy perhaps that thread was ill chosen, maybe the word BOOGER just came into my head..
and I typed it out..
I'm sure there are many many threads on Social I understand less : )
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 14:42:30
In reply to Re: WHAT?!?! I can not believe this.... » spriggy, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 14:37:02
i like admin because i like watching train wrecks. it's a morbid fascination.
i'm not proud of it but i'm also not ashamed. it seems to be a natural human tendency toward conflict and schadenfreude.
i also like to suck my thumb and eat milk and cookies and i really wish i had a mommy.
(ok, i don't really suck my thumb. but the rest is true.)
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 16:03:37
In reply to as i confessed before, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 14:42:30
>i'm not proud of it but i'm also not ashamed. it seems to be a natural human tendency toward conflict and schadenfreude.
Yes and then there is a natural human tendency toward initiating conflict. Perfectly natural aswell, just as when one tries to stop that conflict.
>i like watching train wrecks
Well, as a matter of fact after the recent tube (train) bombings in London, which we are constantly reminded of here in the UK (and thoughtout the world I imagine) with the police at most train stations and also armed police on trains throughout the day time, comforting scared passengers....not forgetting the deaths and victims of passengers from such 'train wrecks' Quite frankly, I do not like or ever want to see another train wreck ever again in my life.
I don't appreciate statements like that, nor do I really see them fittingly civil at a time like this, and of course I could forward this to Dr Bob for a Determination to see whether or not he thinks it is fit for the "civil rules"
>it's a morbid fascination.
I do not have the same morbid fasination like yourself and so won't bother.
Take care
Nick
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 16:35:25
In reply to as i confessed before, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 14:42:30
hey nick-i guess you proved that posts can be taken many different ways! wasn't yours??? like i said in the babble....GOOD POINT :-0
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 16:44:54
In reply to Re: as i confessed before, posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 16:03:37
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 16:56:38
In reply to Re: as i confessed before, posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 16:35:25
i don't actually like watching train wrecks -- i've never seen one. it's an expression. and i was just reiterating a fascination for admin that we had a discussion about in social not to long ago, in a tongue-in-cheek (but not sarcastic) manner.i've asked nick england not to post to me anymore because i'm feeling harassed. i hope he'll honor my request. i had assumed that his apology was sincere and that there were no hard feelings, but it doesn't seem like we can get along with each other, so i feel it's best to disengage. [sigh]
it does feel a bit like kindergarten sometimes. right down to the "timeouts." *wry smile*
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 18:57:55
In reply to for the record dr. bob, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 16:56:38
I have heard the admin board compared to car wrecks.. train wrecks.. but never have I seen that anyone respond that way to a common expression.
It's kind of you know like saying you could "kick someone" figure of speech...
Hey Crushed..
I think you're the bomb!
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 19:15:59
In reply to Re: as i confessed before, posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 16:03:37
I could forward this to Dr Bob for a Determination to see whether or not he thinks it is fit for the "civil rules"
>
> >it's a morbid fascination.
>
>
I do not have the same morbid fasination like yourself and so won't bother.Asking for a civility check is not necessarily a desire to incite conflict, and please don't insinuate that about others.
Thanks.
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 19:31:35
In reply to Please Be Civil » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 19:15:59
I dont think you quite take the whole train wreck thing seriously gabbi.
Any follow ups to this, you can read my message at the bottom of the page.
I'm not posting on this 'admin' board anymore, so please dont reply to this message to tempt me further.
Great tag-team by the way, you make a fine pair!
Thanks
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 19:33:23
In reply to Wow » crushedout, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 18:57:55
you are not by any means referring to the bombings in London in any manner are you? i mean you of all people would have no reason to HIDE behind a remark such as "i think youre the bomb" when how ironically, Nickengland and the babbler that you are referring to had a disagreement would you? of course not-that would be against admin. rules now wouldn't it. I HOPE THAT NO PERSON ON THIS SITE WOULD EVER BE DISTASTEFUL ENOUGH TO TRY AND HURT ANYONE WITH A REMARK ABOUT TERRORISM-whether open about it or in a cowardly remark!....and i hope that Dr.Bob looks at your timing w/ that remark and see's it for what it is...a way to try and go between the lines and say something that horrible. Dr.Bob-block me if u must but pls. take a look at the above.
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 19:47:51
In reply to how distasteful!!!! » gabbii, posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 19:33:23
I use that expression all the time, it's a standard sign off to Crushed, but I apologize I wasn't thinking, and it was bad timing.
I would not make fun of tragedy, and though I can see how it looked to you, perhaps you just could have asked?
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 19:49:55
In reply to Please Be Civil » gabbii, posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 19:31:35
I do not blame you one bit for being upset. I lived through 9/11 here in the states but please do not allow certain babblers to hurt you. Look at the source of the remark. I agree-do not even respond to this kind of "support" any longer as neither will i. There are people here that we can do good for so let's use that. Take care and my prayers are with you.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 19:53:06
In reply to Nickengland, posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 19:49:55
but what is that supposed to mean?> please do not allow certain babblers to hurt you. Look at the source of the remark.
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 19:57:26
In reply to Re: how distasteful!!!! » wildcard, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 19:47:51
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 20:00:18
In reply to excuse me » wildcard, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 19:53:06
it refers to gabbi's remark; your the bomb.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:02:01
In reply to Re: excuse me, posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 20:00:18
and what are you trying to imply about her when you say "consider the source"?
Posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 20:04:31
In reply to Re: excuse me » wildcard, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:02:01
exactly what it states.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:13:26
In reply to DNP to me anymore » crushedout, posted by wildcard on August 6, 2005, at 20:04:31
I think her comment "consider the source" could lead gabbi to feel put down. It seems to imply something negative about gabbi, don't you agree?
I'd ask wildcard myself but she's asked me not to post to her, presumably because she doesn't like my questions? (I tried to work it out instead of "running to the teacher," by asking what she meant, but...oh well. It didn't work.)
> exactly what it states.
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:20:53
In reply to Please ask wildcard to be civil-Dr. Bob, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:13:26
Though I can't agree with Wildcards assessment of my intention, or my character, I'll apologize again for how that came across.
I'd intended to apologize after Crushed pointed out to me in A Babblemail how it looked, but Wildcard had already posted about it.It's a common expression, I use it frequently, and well it's not my first experience with mind bogglingly stupid things coming out of my mouth..or across my monitor.
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:22:08
In reply to Please ask wildcard to be civil-Dr. Bob, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:13:26
> I think her comment "consider the source" could lead gabbi to feel put down.
I suppose in theory...
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:23:19
In reply to Well then..., posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:20:53
i definitely didn't think you did it intentionally, gabbi. i thought you were just trying to make me feel better in case i was feeling attacked.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:24:49
In reply to Re: Please ask wildcard to be civil-Dr. Bob » crushedout, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:22:08
I'm glad if it didn't, gabbi! (did it?)regardless, i think it's important to stay civil. some people have thick skins, but that's no reason to have lower standards for posts directed at those people. wouldn't you agree?
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:25:07
In reply to Re: Well then... » gabbii, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:23:19
>
> i definitely didn't think you did it intentionally, gabbi. i thought you were just trying to make me feel better in case i was feeling attacked.Thanks much,
You're the bbbbbbbbbbest?
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:31:20
In reply to Re: Please ask wildcard to be civil-Dr. Bob » gabbii, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:24:49
>
> I'm glad if it didn't, gabbi! (did it?)
>
Noooooo.. actually I think it was one of those self defeating comments.> regardless, i think it's important to stay civil. some people have thick skins, but that's no reason to have lower standards for posts directed at those people. wouldn't you agree?
Yes. I do.
I agree with everything you say, always, all the time..
I'm kidding, of course I agree.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 20:36:32
In reply to Re: Please ask wildcard to be civil-Dr. Bob » crushedout, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 20:31:20
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.