Shown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by WeeWilly on March 14, 2005, at 2:15:53
It appears to me to be unjustified to block Imperminence on the Social site. I guess your like a ref and have to call them like you see them. I'm expressing my opinion that it was a poor call.
Posted by messadivoce on March 14, 2005, at 20:46:47
In reply to Imperminence's block, posted by WeeWilly on March 14, 2005, at 2:15:53
Willy,
I know that Dr. Bob does not arbitrarily block people. He does apply his rules and regulations quite consistently. I think that it was clear that Imperminance was not following the civility rule, esp. the one re: sarcasm. I know that sometimes the regulations can seem a little over the top, but I've been hanging around here awhile and it does work pretty well to keep this community supportive and positive.
Voce
Posted by gardenergirl on March 14, 2005, at 22:59:56
In reply to Re: Imperminence's block » WeeWilly, posted by messadivoce on March 14, 2005, at 20:46:47
There were also two "heads-up" warnings from posters. One from me and one from 10derheart.
gg
Posted by WeeWilly on March 15, 2005, at 11:42:15
In reply to Re: Imperminence's block, posted by gardenergirl on March 14, 2005, at 22:59:56
> There were also two "heads-up" warnings from posters. One from me and one from 10derheart.
>
> ggJust stating my opinion that is opposite of yours and 10derheart's thats all.
Posted by gardenergirl on March 15, 2005, at 16:32:38
In reply to Re: Imperminence's block, posted by WeeWilly on March 15, 2005, at 11:42:15
Okie dokie
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.