Shown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2005, at 8:08:31
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that the three-consecutive post rule be waived for me to post my response to posts on the faith board in regards to the subject of the antichrist.
I am asking for this because of my personal need to counteract the potential of the thread ,IMO, arrousing antisemitic feelings. There is a post now that writes that the antichrist will be associated in some way as being the messiah. This could have the potential,IMO, of bringing in the doctrine of dispensational premilinnialism or some variation of it, that I would like to post a response to becuause in some of the variations of the doctrine, the antichrist is said to be a jewish man. My response can not be posted in 3 posts and I feel that I will be at a disadvantage to post my response because there is another poster in the thread that has posted that the antichrist is in some way associated with the end-time. This is all involved in the doctrine of dispensational premilinniallism that I would like to post what I have been revealed which is different from that.
If I could not be afforded this , could you close the thread now or delete the thread? I am afraid that if the other posters continue to post the rest of the doctrine of dispensational premilinnialism as put forth by popular evangelicals, that the "antichrist" could be expressed as someone that is "against christ" which some say are the jews and others that do not honor Christ as the messiah. Now if I could respond to these posts that are already on the faith board in more than 3 consecutive posts, then I could feel that I have the opportunity to post accordingly, but with the restraint of 3 consecutive posts, I feel that I am at a disadvantage to respond accordingly.
Perhps if I am allowed 3 consecutive posts for each of the other posters that are posting in regards to any part of the doctrine of dispensational premilinnialism, that that could work. So if there are 3 posters posting in regards to any part of that doctrine, then I could be allowed 9 consecutive posts and so forth.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2005, at 10:05:21
In reply to Lou's requestto Dr. Hsiung-wvrul, posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2005, at 8:08:31
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that if I am not going to be allowed to post more than 3 consecutive posts that you write if it is acceptable or not that I be allowed to have an affilliate to post a post after my third post for the purpose of allowing me to post 3 more posts even though the post by that person will be only to do that.
For instance, after my 3erd post, the other poster will post something like,"continue, Lou" and give me the opportunity to post 3 more posts and so on. Granted, this circumventes the rule, and I do not like the concept of such, but in light of my wanting to respond to the antichrist posts with more than 3 consecutive posts, I am requesting for you to write if you would allow this or not .
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on February 3, 2005, at 0:49:00
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-cicumvnt, posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2005, at 10:05:21
> I am requesting ... that you write if it is acceptable or not that I be allowed to have an affilliate to post a post after my third post for the purpose of allowing me to post 3 more posts even though the post by that person will be only to do that.
> For instance, after my 3erd post, the other poster will post something like,"continue, Lou" and give me the opportunity to post 3 more posts and so on.If someone else wants you to continue, then I think it should be OK for you to continue...
Bob
Posted by Dinah on February 3, 2005, at 11:39:09
In reply to Lou's requestto Dr. Hsiung-wvrul, posted by Lou Pilder on February 2, 2005, at 8:08:31
Lou, I'm always interested in what you have to say. I don't think there would be any rule breaking if I put in an honest "I'm interested, Lou. Could you tell me more?" every, say, three posts.
Just give me a heads up where the thread is and be patient with me because I'll be in and out a bit.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 3, 2005, at 12:36:13
In reply to Re: Lou's requestto Dr. Hsiung-wvrul » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on February 3, 2005, at 11:39:09
Dinah,
Thanks for volunteering for this.
Lou
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.