![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2004, at 7:00:31
Dr. Hsiung,
I am requesting that you make a determination concerning the acceptability or not for the following on the faith board.
The post is titled, Faith, posted by rayww on October 5, 2004.
In that post, there is a link offered and when you click on that link there is a page that is titled, Search Results. In that page, you can read under, 2.GS Faith:
[...Salvation cometh to {nonesuch} except it be through faith on the Lord Jesus Christ...].
I am requesting for you to make a determination as to if it is acceptable for that to be posted in regards to the forum's standards, for the opening page of the faith board writes something like,[...whoever dares say that there is no salvation outside the church should be...]and then there is written after that something like, [...that supports the policy here...].
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040914/msgs/399313.html
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2004, at 8:59:22
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-~sal, posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2004, at 7:00:31
Dr. Hsiung,
Another reason that I am asking you to make a determination as to the acceptability or not, of the post in question, is that the statement ,IMO,has the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings.
There is, IMO, the potential for others to think after reading the statement in question , that those that do not have in their faith that [...salvation comes to none such except it be through faith on the Lord Jesus Christ...]are inferior faiths or false faiths or wayward faiths,or inadaquate faiths because the statement in question has, IMO, the potential to convey that Jews that do not associate their salvation through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ can not be saved, and other faiths that also do not associate their salvation [...except it be through faith on the Lord Jesus Christ...]also can not be saved.
I am requesting that if your determination as to the statements acceptability or not is decided that the statement is acceptable, that the 3-post rule be excepted in my response to the statement that I will post on the faith board, for my refutation would be lenghly.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on October 9, 2004, at 17:08:18
In reply to Lou's request to Dr. Hsiung-~sal, posted by Lou Pilder on October 8, 2004, at 7:00:31
> I am requesting for you to make a determination as to if it is acceptable for that to be posted
Thanks for your note, I've asked her to revise that link.
I've also revised that Social Contract link myself, to link to the Table of Contents rather than directly to the text, which included that other statement you rightly objected to.
Bob
Posted by Dinah on October 9, 2004, at 17:44:08
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on October 9, 2004, at 17:08:18
>
> I've also revised that Social Contract link myself, to link to the Table of Contents rather than directly to the text, which included that other statement you rightly objected to.
>
> BobIn respect. Thanks, Dr. Bob.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.