Shown: posts 1 to 3 of 3. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by jane d on June 30, 2004, at 22:38:13
I was disappointed when I noticed that there were no archives for discontinued boards. For example it feels strange not to have the posts from the childrens board when earlier and later posts on that subject are still available on the main board.
At the same time I'm not entirely comfortable with the idea of these archives being continued forever. Five years from now I'm sure that I'll want to leave what I said today behind me. And I think I should be able to.** Circumstances also change. Someone who had an elemtary school age child when they first posted could now have a teenager who knows them well enough to recognize details that no one else could. Or I could have an acquaintance I'd like to point to a helpful site but don't want to have to think about every thing I've ever posted before deciding whether I can afford to do that.
Since it's now the sites anniverary (six!) it seems like a good time to suggest that the archives get cut off after some fixed number of years. Maybe four or five. Or six. Or three.
Eventually they become less useful. The information is out of date and the original posters are probably no longer around to answer any follow ups. It would cut down on server volume. Personally I wouldn't care if the archives were still saved for offline use.
Finally it would be doing a big favor to any new person who, like I was, is so excited to find this place that they have to read every single post. When I arrived it took roughly one sleepless week as I recall. I hate to think how long I'd be glued to the screen today.** I do know about the sites that archive the internet. Removing the archives here does not eliminate them from the internet. This is something I hope everybody else who posts on the internet realizes as well. But if they are harder to stumble across by accident that might be good enough.
I'm curious to know what people think.
Jane
Posted by zenhussy on June 30, 2004, at 23:33:35
In reply to Archives - keeping them and removing them., posted by jane d on June 30, 2004, at 22:38:13
I think a time limit is a good idea. Most free sites out of necessity dump the archives after a year or three. I have never supported this being a pay site nor would I suggest it.
I think your examples are specific and clear and show a sound reason for limiting endless archives.
I too remember the childrens board and when it was discontinued.
I accept that my words are here. I know that the revelations I've made on this board are easy enough for someone to figure me out. I've had some contact with admin over the years regarding matters pertaining to this issue and my feeling is that the archives are here as long as Dr. Bob is alive and breathing. <---*opinion of zh alone*
It probably wouldn't be a very happy thing for me to reread my posts five years from now but with that grain of faith maybe if those archives are gathering cobwebs on this site I might be able to see I've made progress. However a free online site isn't that place I guess.
Thought provoking and good timing with this post Jane D.
--zh
Posted by tabitha on June 30, 2004, at 23:34:44
In reply to Archives - keeping them and removing them., posted by jane d on June 30, 2004, at 22:38:13
I like the idea of some kind of expiration date on archiving too. I have the same concerns about everything I've ever posted being available. Dr Bob's site is so prominent-- it's so easy to find from all kinds of searches and directories. I'm afraid to even mention to some friends that I use a support site related to mental health because I'm afraid it would be pretty easy to guess which one, and figure out who I am. I'd feel a bit more secure if I at least knew there was an expiration on archives. Maybe 5 years? Or 2 or 3?
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.