![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 10 of 10. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by shar on May 11, 2004, at 16:42:16
In reply to Please be clear.... » finelinebob, posted by 64bowtie on May 9, 2004, at 4:24:28
> I miss the cantancorousness of Larry-Hoover and Zen-Hussey
>
(Please be clear.... » finelinebobPosted by 64bowtie on May 9, 2004, at 4:24:28
In reply to http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040503/msgs/344993.html)
............................................
The above statement is from a post from Rod/64 Bowtie on Psychology. While it may have been meant with some sort of 'affection,' I don't believe it meets the standards of civility (isn't it just name-calling?). It seems like it could make someone feel demeaned/put-down/defensive.One part I especially do not like is that Zen is not here to comment on her own behalf. It could be that it wouldn't be a big deal to her, but I hate seeing her called names to which she is unable to respond because she's blocked. Certainly being blocked doesn't give those of us here license to take advantage of someone's inability to reply.
Civil or not?
Thanks,
Shar
Posted by gabbix2 on May 11, 2004, at 17:26:13
In reply to civil?, posted by shar on May 11, 2004, at 16:42:16
Cantancerous? Larry Hoover??!!!!!
That doesn't fit. Zen? Fiery maybe, but not cantancerous. Odd.
I don't find it to be civil either.
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 13, 2004, at 13:21:59
In reply to civil?, posted by shar on May 11, 2004, at 16:42:16
> > I miss the cantancorousness of Larry-Hoover and Zen-Hussey
> >
> (Please be clear.... » finelinebob
>
> Posted by 64bowtie on May 9, 2004, at 4:24:28
>
> In reply to http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040503/msgs/344993.html)
> ............................................
> The above statement is from a post from Rod/64 Bowtie on Psychology. While it may have been meant with some sort of 'affection,' I don't believe it meets the standards of civility (isn't it just name-calling?). It seems like it could make someone feel demeaned/put-down/defensive.
>
> One part I especially do not like is that Zen is not here to comment on her own behalf. It could be that it wouldn't be a big deal to her, but I hate seeing her called names to which she is unable to respond because she's blocked. Certainly being blocked doesn't give those of us here license to take advantage of someone's inability to reply.
>
> Civil or not?
> Thanks,
> SharNot.
Hypocrite Bob said: "I don't think it would work to administrate based on intent, so I go by words." But the words were directed at certain people. 'Nuff said.
Lar
Posted by chemist on May 14, 2004, at 0:37:37
In reply to Re: civil? » shar, posted by Larry Hoover on May 13, 2004, at 13:21:59
larry, we almost connected....are you still there? chemist
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 14, 2004, at 14:20:07
In reply to Re: civil? » Larry Hoover, posted by chemist on May 14, 2004, at 0:37:37
> larry, we almost connected....are you still there? chemist
I will try again. I've not been very well at all.
Lar
Posted by chemist on May 14, 2004, at 14:47:06
In reply to Re: civil? » chemist, posted by Larry Hoover on May 14, 2004, at 14:20:07
> > larry, we almost connected....are you still there? chemist
>
> I will try again. I've not been very well at all.
>
> Lar
>
>
i understand....give me a shout when you are up to it....feel better and be well...chemist
Posted by Dr. Bob on May 15, 2004, at 1:02:28
In reply to civil?, posted by shar on May 11, 2004, at 16:42:16
> While it may have been meant with some sort of 'affection,' I don't believe it meets the standards of civility (isn't it just name-calling?).
That was why I let it go at first, but I think you're right. Except I wouldn't say "just". Thanks for the input,
Bob
Posted by crushedout on May 16, 2004, at 14:25:42
In reply to Re: not civil, posted by Dr. Bob on May 15, 2004, at 1:02:28
Dr. Bob,
Just a policy question, so I understand how this works: Why wasn't Bowtie blocked? Was this the first time he got PBC'd? (I'm not advocating for blockage or nonblockage -- just trying to understand.)
Thanks.
Posted by Dr. Bob on May 18, 2004, at 1:43:42
In reply to Re: not civil » Dr. Bob, posted by crushedout on May 16, 2004, at 14:25:42
> Just a policy question, so I understand how this works: Why wasn't Bowtie blocked? Was this the first time he got PBC'd?
It wasn't the first time, but I think it's good to be flexible sometimes...
Bob
Posted by 64bowtie on May 21, 2004, at 13:14:17
In reply to Re: not blocked, posted by Dr. Bob on May 18, 2004, at 1:43:42
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.