![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 20 to 44 of 44. Go back in thread:
Posted by john locke on December 21, 2015, at 16:43:36
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by Lamdage22 on December 21, 2015, at 12:46:33
> Potentially yes.
>
> I think the social anxiety aspect of Nardil doesnt tend to poop out. For me only the AD effect pooped out (and gave way to psychosis). The SA aspect didnt poop out.
>
> Scott?Nardil made you irreversibly psychotic, even when you stopped taking the drug?
Posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 0:15:57
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 21, 2015, at 7:21:26
Even if there is no "reason" for your social anxiety, CBT or DBT can be helpful. It is hard to predict how successful such therapies would be, but it wouldn't hurt to try.
--Meh, I don't really believe in cognitive therapy. I think anxiety is an emotion and solely that. This emotion will very well affect your thoughts, but it doesn't work the other way around. I do read about CBT having success with treating social anxiety, though, so I guess i can only know by trying. I recall one study saying there was barely any difference in the results for patients treated with CBT versus those with simply BT.
--What is DBT?
Anxiety and depression can reinforce each other. It is possible that reducing one will improve the other.
--My first ever therapist was of the belief that depression is always a symptom of chronic anxiety. I completely agree with this. She seemed very confident that this is becoming the accepted truth in psychiatry nowadays.
Posted by Lamdage22 on December 22, 2015, at 1:56:08
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on December 21, 2015, at 16:34:13
> > Why isnt Phenylethylidenehydrazine (GABA-T inhibitor) marketed as an anxiolytic?
> >
> > Is it not orally active?
>
> Never heard of it. Do you think it would function like Nardil with respect to GABA? Very interesting.
>
> You sure are a motivated learner.
>
>
> - ScottYes, Scott. Its a Nardil metabolite and it is responsible for Nardils efficacy for social anxiety.
Posted by Lamdage22 on December 22, 2015, at 1:57:53
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 21, 2015, at 16:43:36
> > Potentially yes.
> >
> > I think the social anxiety aspect of Nardil doesnt tend to poop out. For me only the AD effect pooped out (and gave way to psychosis). The SA aspect didnt poop out.
> >
> > Scott?
>
> Nardil made you irreversibly psychotic, even when you stopped taking the drug?
>
>
I took it for a long time even when it made me psychotic unfortunately. I was stubborn.
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 7:08:12
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 0:15:57
> > Anxiety and depression can reinforce each other. It is possible that reducing one will improve the other.
> --My first ever therapist was of the belief that depression is always a symptom of chronic anxiety. I completely agree with this. She seemed very confident that this is becoming the accepted truth in psychiatry nowadays.This is not quite true. First of all, "always" is a big word. Secondly, it is true that many - perhaps most - but not all depressions are due to chronic psychosocial stress (especially early in life), of which anxiety is just one type. Not all psychosocial stress manifests as chronic anxiety. Learned negative thinking without anxiety is one example.
Not all anxiety disorders manifest as chronic anxiety. Not all chronic anxiety represent an anxiety disorder.
Depression is depression. When anxiety is a component or symptom of depression, it tends to resolve when the depression resolves. This is not true when an anxiety disorder is comorbid with depression.
Depression in young people often begins as anxiety and insomnia; the anxiety to later disappear and leave depression only - even without treatment.
Things are not so simple. In this case, I don't think the word "always" is at all helpful.
Sorry for the strong language, John, but I really object to your doctor's characterization. It is, in my opinion, counterproductive. Getting rid of anxiety will not automatically get rid of depression. In the absence of an anxiety disorder, it is more often the other way around.
Anyway, good luck on your continuing Nardil trial. As was mentioned, dizziness and urinary retention can be problematic. If you choose to addresss these things pharmacologically, the dizziness can be dealt with by using either Florinef (fludrocortisone) or Ritalin (methylphenidate). Hopefully, any urinary retention can be remedied by taking Urecholine (bethanechol). I came close to going to the hospital a number of times for a catheter. Bethanechol helped with this enough that I was able to urinate. I was taking a TCA along with the Nardil at the time, which most likely made things worse. I never had a problem with Nardil monotherapy. Even with the combination, urinary retention subsided after a few weeks.
- Scott
Posted by Lamdage22 on December 22, 2015, at 7:42:28
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by Lamdage22 on December 22, 2015, at 1:57:53
I dont know how many people have the fate of developing psychosis on Nardil
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 8:57:23
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by Lamdage22 on December 22, 2015, at 7:42:28
> I dont know how many people have the fate of developing psychosis on Nardil
I have had psychotic episodes in association with MAOIs: two with Nardil and two with Parnate. I have bipolar depression with rare medication-induced mania. Mine is a form of bipolar I. I haven't had an episode in 13 years. It is possible that Abilify is preventing any further manic reactions from occurring.
- Scott
Posted by John locke on December 22, 2015, at 9:36:52
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 7:08:12
> > > Anxiety and depression can reinforce each other. It is possible that reducing one will improve the other.
>
> > --My first ever therapist was of the belief that depression is always a symptom of chronic anxiety. I completely agree with this. She seemed very confident that this is becoming the accepted truth in psychiatry nowadays.
>
> This is not quite true. First of all, "always" is a big word. Secondly, it is true that many - perhaps most - but not all depressions are due to chronic psychosocial stress (especially early in life), of which anxiety is just one type. Not all psychosocial stress manifests as chronic anxiety. Learned negative thinking without anxiety is one example.
>
> Not all anxiety disorders manifest as chronic anxiety. Not all chronic anxiety represent an anxiety disorder.
>
> Depression is depression. When anxiety is a component or symptom of depression, it tends to resolve when the depression resolves. This is not true when an anxiety disorder is comorbid with depression.
>
> Depression in young people often begins as anxiety and insomnia; the anxiety to later disappear and leave depression only - even without treatment.
>
> Things are not so simple. In this case, I don't think the word "always" is at all helpful.
>
> Sorry for the strong language, John, but I really object to your doctor's characterization. It is, in my opinion, counterproductive. Getting rid of anxiety will not automatically get rid of depression. In the absence of an anxiety disorder, it is more often the other way around.
>
> Anyway, good luck on your continuing Nardil trial. As was mentioned, dizziness and urinary retention can be problematic. If you choose to addresss these things pharmacologically, the dizziness can be dealt with by using either Florinef (fludrocortisone) or Ritalin (methylphenidate). Hopefully, any urinary retention can be remedied by taking Urecholine (bethanechol). I came close to going to the hospital a number of times for a catheter. Bethanechol helped with this enough that I was able to urinate. I was taking a TCA along with the Nardil at the time, which most likely made things worse. I never had a problem with Nardil monotherapy. Even with the combination, urinary retention subsided after a few weeks.
>
>
> - ScottBut why/how would someone become depressed without anxiety?
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 10:11:15
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by John locke on December 22, 2015, at 9:36:52
> But why/how would someone become depressed without anxiety?
Are you asking about the biology behind this?
- Scott
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 10:16:40
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by John locke on December 22, 2015, at 9:36:52
I forgot to ask you: Are you a political scientist?
:-)
- Scott
Posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 16:56:13
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » John locke, posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 10:11:15
yes
Posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 17:12:18
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » John locke, posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 10:11:15
Should I be worried that side effects haven't kicked in yet at day 16? Maybe tiredness is kicking in; I'm not sure. I've read that sides can be a sign that the med is working.
Posted by PeterMartin on December 22, 2015, at 18:53:50
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 17:12:18
> Should I be worried that side effects haven't kicked in yet at day 16? Maybe tiredness is kicking in; I'm not sure. I've read that sides can be a sign that the med is working.
Side effects are definitely a good indicator.
I take Marplan (the most similar MAOI to Nardil) and had to restart it twice this year. Once due to an insurance issue (off Jan through March then restart) and then most recently I stopped taking Marplan from Oct 30th through Nov 17th (over 2wks).
In Sept/October I noticed my blood pressure was elevated (140ish/95ish). I take 4meds total and tried taking less of each for a day or two at a time but was unable to get it to come down. Prior to noticing it elevated in Sept it had been 117/76 in March (at my last Marplan restart) then in July/Aug 100ish/60ish (which I now believe is thanks to Marplan).
When I noticed the elevated bp get to 160/110 late Oct I went to Urgent Care. Of course they assumed it was the Marplan causing a problem as MAOis are most known for potential to cause hypertensive crisis. What I found out later is that originally MAOis were originally prescribed as anti-hypertensives and in general should lower bp (See: http://www.psychotropical.com/maois-and-blood-pressure-anti-hypertensive-effect).
But yea to get to the point after I stopped my bp didn't get worse but it didn't improve either (stayed 140-150 over 95-100 mostly). Meanwhile my mood tanked. I started sleeping from 11pm until 10am when I used to get up before my gf around 6ish to get breakfast and then find something to get into. I was hurting mentally pretty badly.
My doctor let me restart Marplan on Nov 17th. I've journaled everyday since Oct regarding changes to try to narrow down what med was doing what. So due to that I can tell you some date events on this most recent Marplan restart:
Nov 17: Restart (at 30mg which is slighly under recommended dose but what I was on previously from 2011-2014 and then spring/summer 2015)
Nov 24: First earlier wake day. Instead of waking up at 9am this is where I started having a few days getting up ~7am. Which for me is nice. I don't oversleep. So something was happening.
Nov 28: Noted as "First real early wake day". Started getting up at 6:30 read to go out to grab breakfast/etc.
Nov 29: First time I noticed my Blood pressure on my home cuff down a bunch. I got 120/85 but as it turned out it kinda went back up for a while to 135/95.....either way the was some bp affect starting to take place.
Dec 9th: Saw my doctor and he advised to go to 40mg Marplan (recommended dose after a wk per pdr) for a wk then go to 50mg. The max recommended dose of Marplan is 60mg. So now I'd be in the middle of the recommended range rather than 10mg below which I had been in times before.
Dec 15: BP still around 135/95
Dec 16: 130/89 - Marplan to 50mg
Dec 20: 126/90
Dec 21: 117/79
Dec 22 (Today): 98/68
So yea for me it take about a month to notice the side effects. In my case the hypotension side effect is super beneficial as I'd probably need bp meds if it weren't for Marplan. I think when Urgent care took me off it cold turkey I had a bit of rebound hypertension.I also checked my earlier 2015 restart and I startted on 5/13. I measured my bp on 5/17 and was concerned w/ a 150/90 reading. I didn't have a cuff at the time so I just waited it out only checking weekly and the main drop happened around 6/10 (90/70).
Sadly my ability to orgasm has also pretty much gone away the last couple of days but I've had that come and then go away after a period of time. I also noticed when I stopped Marplan in early '15 and also in Nov I started have the opposite of anorgasmia (premature actually)....which was kinda nice. But yea that was another side effect that just started coming around the last few days (about a month) after restarting Marplan on Nov 17th......the increase to a good dose was probably needed and I now believe that is probably why I had elevated bp in Sept/Oct - I actually needed a dose increase on Marplan not a reduction/cesesation.
But yea I would say in my experience stopping and restarting has worked fine. My mood is great and I'm ecstatic that my bp has come around. I'd give it at least a month to 6wks. Watch for the low bp on standing. Watch for libido. Those sorta things.....
Sorry if this reads terrible as I'm writing it stream of thought, I didn't intend to write this much, and I'm not going to proof-read :) That said maybe it'll be insightful and good luck!!
Posted by baseball55 on December 22, 2015, at 19:35:00
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by John locke on December 22, 2015, at 9:36:52
> But why/how would someone become depressed without anxiety?
I've never really suffered from anxiety. But I've suffered greatly from depression. The two times I had anxiety, I wasn't depressed but was under tremendous stress. The idea that depression is just a subset of anxiety makes no sense to me. It sounds like your doctor has limited experience with depression.
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 19:52:28
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 17:12:18
> Should I be worried that side effects haven't kicked in yet at day 16?
No, you should not be worried. For how many days have you been at 60 mg/day?
> Maybe tiredness is kicking in; I'm not sure. I've read that sides can be a sign that the med is working.
I think dizziness (orthostatic hypotension) is an index of MAO inhibition. If, upon standing up, your blood pressure drops by 10%, that is supposed to be a sign that your dosage is high enough, but not necessarily that the drug is going to work.
One rule of thumb is to give each dosage increase three weeks to work. If you can tolerate 90 mg/day, you could then stay at that dosage and continue treatment. Some people don't respond robustly to Nardil for several months. Since you are virtually medication naive, I should think that you would respond more quickly. I hope so. Investing months in a drug that might not work can be frustrating and difficult to deal with.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 20:23:45
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 22, 2015, at 16:56:13
> yes
I wish I could come up with a singular definitive answer to your question. There are so many theories, I wouldn't presume to know which one approximates reality. Data is accumulating quickly, but understanding is not.
I think the condition to which we ascribe the one word, "depression", is actually a variety of disorders or illnesses, each of which has a different etiology or process of induction. I'm sure chronic anxiety is one of them. It might be true that the role anxiety plays in the precipitation of depression has been underappreciated, but it is not the monolithic cause of all cases.
I like the idea of various types of stress exerting "depressive pressure" on the system. If the stress is more than the system can handle, depression is the result. This could be anxiety, sex-hormones, learned helplessness, childhood neglect, chronic negative thinking, physical illness, grief and bereavement, etc. Each person's system has a different threshold for tolerating depressive pressure. People who have the biological traits that yield resilience can be exposed to large amounts of stress without ever getting depressed. Other people - perhaps those with varying genotypes - will become depressed at a much lower threshold of stress.
- Scott
Posted by John locke on December 22, 2015, at 21:05:49
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by PeterMartin on December 22, 2015, at 18:53:50
> > Should I be worried that side effects haven't kicked in yet at day 16? Maybe tiredness is kicking in; I'm not sure. I've read that sides can be a sign that the med is working.
>
> Side effects are definitely a good indicator.
>
> I take Marplan (the most similar MAOI to Nardil) and had to restart it twice this year. Once due to an insurance issue (off Jan through March then restart) and then most recently I stopped taking Marplan from Oct 30th through Nov 17th (over 2wks).
>
> In Sept/October I noticed my blood pressure was elevated (140ish/95ish). I take 4meds total and tried taking less of each for a day or two at a time but was unable to get it to come down. Prior to noticing it elevated in Sept it had been 117/76 in March (at my last Marplan restart) then in July/Aug 100ish/60ish (which I now believe is thanks to Marplan).
>
> When I noticed the elevated bp get to 160/110 late Oct I went to Urgent Care. Of course they assumed it was the Marplan causing a problem as MAOis are most known for potential to cause hypertensive crisis. What I found out later is that originally MAOis were originally prescribed as anti-hypertensives and in general should lower bp (See: http://www.psychotropical.com/maois-and-blood-pressure-anti-hypertensive-effect).
>
> But yea to get to the point after I stopped my bp didn't get worse but it didn't improve either (stayed 140-150 over 95-100 mostly). Meanwhile my mood tanked. I started sleeping from 11pm until 10am when I used to get up before my gf around 6ish to get breakfast and then find something to get into. I was hurting mentally pretty badly.
>
> My doctor let me restart Marplan on Nov 17th. I've journaled everyday since Oct regarding changes to try to narrow down what med was doing what. So due to that I can tell you some date events on this most recent Marplan restart:
>
> Nov 17: Restart (at 30mg which is slighly under recommended dose but what I was on previously from 2011-2014 and then spring/summer 2015)
>
> Nov 24: First earlier wake day. Instead of waking up at 9am this is where I started having a few days getting up ~7am. Which for me is nice. I don't oversleep. So something was happening.
>
> Nov 28: Noted as "First real early wake day". Started getting up at 6:30 read to go out to grab breakfast/etc.
>
> Nov 29: First time I noticed my Blood pressure on my home cuff down a bunch. I got 120/85 but as it turned out it kinda went back up for a while to 135/95.....either way the was some bp affect starting to take place.
>
> Dec 9th: Saw my doctor and he advised to go to 40mg Marplan (recommended dose after a wk per pdr) for a wk then go to 50mg. The max recommended dose of Marplan is 60mg. So now I'd be in the middle of the recommended range rather than 10mg below which I had been in times before.
>
> Dec 15: BP still around 135/95
>
> Dec 16: 130/89 - Marplan to 50mg
> Dec 20: 126/90
> Dec 21: 117/79
> Dec 22 (Today): 98/68
>
>
> So yea for me it take about a month to notice the side effects. In my case the hypotension side effect is super beneficial as I'd probably need bp meds if it weren't for Marplan. I think when Urgent care took me off it cold turkey I had a bit of rebound hypertension.
>
> I also checked my earlier 2015 restart and I startted on 5/13. I measured my bp on 5/17 and was concerned w/ a 150/90 reading. I didn't have a cuff at the time so I just waited it out only checking weekly and the main drop happened around 6/10 (90/70).
>
> Sadly my ability to orgasm has also pretty much gone away the last couple of days but I've had that come and then go away after a period of time. I also noticed when I stopped Marplan in early '15 and also in Nov I started have the opposite of anorgasmia (premature actually)....which was kinda nice. But yea that was another side effect that just started coming around the last few days (about a month) after restarting Marplan on Nov 17th......the increase to a good dose was probably needed and I now believe that is probably why I had elevated bp in Sept/Oct - I actually needed a dose increase on Marplan not a reduction/cesesation.
>
> But yea I would say in my experience stopping and restarting has worked fine. My mood is great and I'm ecstatic that my bp has come around. I'd give it at least a month to 6wks. Watch for the low bp on standing. Watch for libido. Those sorta things.....
>
> Sorry if this reads terrible as I'm writing it stream of thought, I didn't intend to write this much, and I'm not going to proof-read :) That said maybe it'll be insightful and good luck!!
>
>Thank you Peter. It's nice to know that stopping and starting is potential option, but if Nardil is my miracle med then I can't say I'd be too comfortable taking the risk.
I'm glad that you're feeling better :)
Posted by john locke on December 23, 2015, at 2:28:54
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 22, 2015, at 20:23:45
I read this online: "Staying hydrated increases effectiveness markedly - at least 1/2 gallons of fluids a day, 3/4 is better"
Is it true??
John
Posted by SLS on December 23, 2015, at 5:52:30
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 23, 2015, at 2:28:54
> I read this online: "Staying hydrated increases effectiveness markedly - at least 1/2 gallons of fluids a day, 3/4 is better"
>
> Is it true??I hadn't heard that.
As far as stopping and restarting Nardil is concerned, I would say that the longer you take it, the greater the risk that it won't work again if you stop and restart it. That's why I suggested to either commit to taking it indefinitely now, rather than to begin taking it with the intention of stopping it in the future in order to try other things. If you do want to try other things, I would stop taking Nardil now and keep it in your back-pocket knowing that it probably has not already produced drug-induced refractoriness. Of course, if you do choose to take Nardil, there may be completely novel and wholly effective treatments found for your condition in the years to come which might allow you to discontinue the drug. These would include brain stimulation techniques, whether invasive or non-invasive. For example, ECT, rTMS, and DCS are considered to be non-invasive brain stimulation treatments. I didn't like ECT.
Guarantees are hard to come by.
Damn these illnesses. They steal our essence of personhood as human beings and give nothing in return but pain and isolation.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on December 23, 2015, at 6:44:10
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 23, 2015, at 5:52:30
Hi, John.
"Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to Treat Social Anxiety Disorder: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3837365/
- Scott
Posted by john locke on December 23, 2015, at 8:00:30
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 23, 2015, at 5:52:30
> > I read this online: "Staying hydrated increases effectiveness markedly - at least 1/2 gallons of fluids a day, 3/4 is better"
> >
> > Is it true??
>
> I hadn't heard that.
>
> As far as stopping and restarting Nardil is concerned, I would say that the longer you take it, the greater the risk that it won't work again if you stop and restart it. That's why I suggested to either commit to taking it indefinitely now, rather than to begin taking it with the intention of stopping it in the future in order to try other things. If you do want to try other things, I would stop taking Nardil now and keep it in your back-pocket knowing that it probably has not already produced drug-induced refractoriness. Of course, if you do choose to take Nardil, there may be completely novel and wholly effective treatments found for your condition in the years to come which might allow you to discontinue the drug. These would include brain stimulation techniques, whether invasive or non-invasive. For example, ECT, rTMS, and DCS are considered to be non-invasive brain stimulation treatments. I didn't like ECT.Much appreciated, Scott. Sounds interesting.
> Damn these illnesses. They steal our essence of personhood as human beings and give nothing in return but pain and isolation.
I know :(...I miss me and my friends so much
Posted by john locke on December 23, 2015, at 8:14:58
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by SLS on December 23, 2015, at 6:44:10
> Hi, John.
>
> "Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to Treat Social Anxiety Disorder: Case Reports and a Review of the Literature"
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3837365/
>
>
> - ScottHm..thats good to see. Much thanks, Scott.
John
Posted by Escapee on December 23, 2015, at 22:04:25
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by John locke on December 21, 2015, at 8:57:40
> This may have been said--what are you taking it for, and for how long?
>
>I don't take it anymore. I take a different maoi now isocarboxazid. And compared to phenelzine its not such a good anti-phobic med. Ive had to augment it wildly. I will go back to it one day but, not until after giving tranylcypromine a bash. From what I've gathered phenelzine works by needing friends (and actually making friends). I remember craving for company. But from what I gather tranylcypromine can make someone feel quite comfortable being alone and are less afraid of strangers because of boost of dopamine. And generally a lot more forward. One of the more complex maois...
Posted by john locke on December 26, 2015, at 10:30:06
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart » john locke, posted by SLS on December 20, 2015, at 7:23:37
> > Social anxiety and atypical depression. I'm worried that the Nardil will be working well (or doing something at least), but, due to side effects, I'll want to wash out and try something else, whether it be medication or not. Then it might not work if I try to get back on it. For this reason I'm thinking that maybe I should try all possible things before trying Nardil.
>
> I understand your logic. I would not question it.
>
> > I started Nardil 2 weeks ago and am up to 60 mg.
>
> If you decide to continue with Nardil, I would not stop taking it before reaching a dosage of 75 mg/day for two or three weeks. Some people need 90 mg/day. 60 mg/day can work, but I wouldn't stay there too long if nothing is happening.
>
> My GUESS is that being on Nardil for only two weeks would not set you up for what is called "drug-induced drug-refractoriness" (not responding a second time to the same drug).
>
> What are your concerns with taking Nardil?
>
> What drugs have you already tried?
>
>
>
> - ScottOk so I've decided to hold back on Nardil for now so that I can try non-medication options. Do you think there would be anything wrong with staying on a dose of say 15 mg a day for months on end while I try these options so that I can get the desired effect of Nardil faster if/when I decide to try a legitimate trial?
John
Posted by SLS on December 26, 2015, at 12:02:09
In reply to Re: Nardil washout and then restart, posted by john locke on December 26, 2015, at 10:30:06
> Do you think there would be anything wrong with staying on a dose of say 15 mg a day for months on end while I try these options so that I can get the desired effect of Nardil faster if/when I decide to try a legitimate trial?
That's an interesting thought, but I wouldn't recommend it. I don't think you would save much, if any, time in responding to Nardil when you begin your titration upwards. Besides, there is an unknown, but conceivable risk of experiencing drug-induced drug refractoriness. I don't think the risk is worth a few days or weeks saved in gleaning a response. I can't know for sure. I tend to be conservative in my recommendations.
- Scott
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.