![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 12 to 36 of 42. Go back in thread:
Posted by Phillipa on November 7, 2012, at 20:36:59
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by linkadge on November 7, 2012, at 20:06:00
Link what are your suggestions in all sincerity? Phillipa
Posted by rjlockhart37 on November 7, 2012, at 22:35:33
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by linkadge on November 7, 2012, at 20:06:00
hey link....my implication was not directly to point them out..its just starting to how observe the doctor and know what there thinking, why I'm doing this.... my doctor for period of 4 months would say I need no change to my meds and kept writing the same stuff I was on that was S H I T medication...besides prozac, and i finally had enough of her over ego speculations. I went to a psych hosptial both for that the thing that really made to step on the peddle to go was i've had the figure of the devil in my head and was trying to possess my body, i got all these wierd thoughts of doing crazy stuff....its too much wack to explain.
But back to my point, my doctor found out that I had went on when I was I was released and discharged, she got the papers of what happened. And then she said...rj you could of gotten a appointment with me...you see its like a trap to pay money and she sits there and doesnt do maintaince....its corrupt and still to this day. So...I gotta think corrupt to understand what their of treatment is...So the reason I wrote this is to deal with difficult doctors. Link...i know you probaly know, and still think in my mind I need stimulants, the only thing that has been prescibed so far is Nuvigil which ... is good for stying awake, and keeping me alert.
So....would I like to have what I want? yes...but the stuff that's happening right now...its not going to happen for a long time...i already know that, and have tried everytime I have force myself to do my own personal research...really its hard, ill think about something, go smoke, and then totally forget what I was doing. It's like breaking your leg in a rehab and you've had a past with heroine abuse, they won't give you anything...the best is suboxne. When I was in rehab....alot of herione addicts where on suboxyne[mispelled] and they still said they felt like sh*t. So in my case ... Nuvigil is similar. I hope you get what im saying...because I already know i'm an addict....and i am prone to abuse. Its just the other mental stuff that started this that are really being a problem, manic, fear filled, im afraid because of all my failures that are repeated when I do things, like work, go out with people.....the best awnser of how I am is written here on babble. So...yea
thanks...:)
r
Posted by linkadge on November 8, 2012, at 17:33:10
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » linkadge, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 7, 2012, at 22:35:33
>kept writing the same stuff I was on that was S H I T medication
Most / all medictions are sh*t medications and the so called 'good ones' (stimulants, opioids, benzos) just mess you up more longer term. The grass is always greener on the other side.
Posted by herpills on November 8, 2012, at 23:30:19
In reply to playing chess with psychiatry, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 6, 2012, at 15:15:49
As long as you keep going to a doctor that you HATE, you will probably NEVER get better. Time for a new doc...
Posted by sleepygirl2 on November 9, 2012, at 10:16:06
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » ShawnThomas, posted by Phil on November 7, 2012, at 11:26:48
Hey,
I noticed that too. :-)What I kinda thought was interesting is that the poster seems to say that since we don't have the knowledge, presumably, that a dr has, we are limited in our ability to make informed decisions.
Also, that a lack of insight might prevent us to make proper decisions about medication.
I guess... But doesn't it all seem terribly paternalistic?
As in, yes, "grand and benevolent master... Dispense at thy will, we naively accept thy pharmaceutical offerings..."I gotta say though, rjlockhart, it has been my impression that your substance abuse issues are pretty damn primary, and that's going to be your undoing.
Stimulants and.... I feel like you've mentioned crystal meth??? Am I not remembering correctly?
That'll get you good and psychotic.
Posted by SLS on November 9, 2012, at 13:00:17
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 9, 2012, at 10:16:06
> I gotta say though, rjlockhart, it has been my impression that your substance abuse issues are pretty damn primary, and that's going to be your undoing.
rjlockhart37:
I am not a professional, but I react the same way when I read your posts.
1. What are the symptoms of your conditions?
2. What are the diagnoses that your doctors have attached to these symptoms?
3. What drugs or substances have you had the most success with for treating your conditions?
- Scott
Posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 15:32:30
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 9, 2012, at 10:16:06
> What I kinda thought was interesting is that the poster seems to say that since we don't have the knowledge, presumably, that a dr has, we are limited in our ability to make informed decisions.
> Also, that a lack of insight might prevent us to make proper decisions about medication.
> I guess... But doesn't it all seem terribly paternalistic?
> As in, yes, "grand and benevolent master... Dispense at thy will, we naively accept thy pharmaceutical offerings..."I was trying to be very careful with my language. When I mentioned that *some* people have less insight into their conditions, I was definitely not speaking for everyone. I was thinking of a small subset of cases such as severe schizophrenia, which is often characterized by a lack of insight into one's condition. In a vast number of cases, I believe that clients have much more insight into their conditions than psychiatrists do, and many clients are better informed about some medications than their psychiatrists or family physicians. I think it would be a stretch, however, to suggest that anyone has "perfect" insight into his or her psychological condition. We are all in some sense limited when it comes to understanding the immense complexity of our brains and the full effects that medications can have on our unique selves.
I do have concerns that many sources of psychiatric drug information on the Internet, in some journal articles, and in many textbooks are based on questionable premises and shoddy evidence. There is a real challenge for any of us to understand exactly how many medications affect the brain and whether they are appropriate treatments for certain conditions. I do believe that both doctors and clients are often limited when it comes to making the most informed decisions possible about medications, but this is a result of psychiatry being a field in its infancy rather than a result of people being uneducated or unintelligent. In the end, everyone has to simply try to do the best they can with the limited information that is available.
I think that the vast majority of people who see psychiatrists are capable of educating themselves about medications. This is why I said that the individual has the responsibility for deciding how much self-education is ideal. If someone feels like they are unable to comprehend drug information, they will likely need to rely more on their doctor, family, and/or friends for most of their information. I also think that family and friends can sometimes play an important role in helping people to make better choices about medications.
My view of psychiatry (as well as a variety of other fields such as psychology, theoretical physics, and cosmology) is characterized by a large degree of skepticism. I certainly do not have a paternalistic view of psychiatry. I believe that anyone who has the ability ought to make an effort to learn about any medications that a doctor prescribes, and this is especially true with regards to psychiatric drugs. In many cases, I believe that people should strongly question the pharmaceutical suggestions made by psychiatrists and family physicians. The decision to take a psychiatric drug is a serious matter and should not be taken lightly.
Posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 16:22:35
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » ShawnThomas, posted by SLS on November 7, 2012, at 5:54:51
> Why has your personal experience reduced your incentive to study psychiatry? What are the aspects of psychiatry that you would like to see changed?
>
> What substances are you currently taking to treat your cyclothymia?
>
> Thanks.
>
> - ScottI would like to see a decreased use of SSRIs in psychiatry. There are obviously a lot of cases where SSRIs are effective treatments, but we lack sufficient tests to identify the subset of people who will benefit from these drugs and to identify people who will experience unacceptable side-effects. I am also alarmed by the number of children who are prescribed psychiatric drugs. We need better ways to figure out which children truly need medication and which do not. I am concerned that many psychiatrists are not spending enough time with their clients. I also think that we need a better understanding of how infectious diseases and substances in the environment such as organophosphates can potentially lead to psychatric disorders. My biggest wish is that pharmaceutical companies will be able to speed up the development of more effective medications with fewer side-effects for conditions such as depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, panic disorder, and OCD.
I think that I found less of an incentive to study psychiatry for a period of time because I gained a better understanding of myself and needed to round myself out more in other areas. I have come to see cyclothymia as a condition that has a lot of benefits in spite of the sometimes less comfortable aspects of it. I also have a strong interest in educating myself about a wide range of topics, and focusing solely on psychiatry for year after year would limit my ability to gain a fuller understanding of life. I am still interested in helping others to understand psychiatric medications, but it was necessary for me to step back for a while to better appreciate the "big picture." I have been thinking about what sorts of opinions and information are truly important to share with others. I've come to better understand what really matters in life, and it definitely seems to me that educating others about psychiatry will play a bigger role in my life in the coming years than it has in the recent past.
I think that the best treatments for my cyclothymia have been gaining an improved understanding of myself and growing more mature. There really are not any good medications for cyclothymia (at least in my case), so I really limit the substances I take to mild herbs that provide a calming effect. I drink chamomile tea because of its relaxing effects and occasionally take valerian to help me sleep. I've also taken l-theanine, passionflower extract, and kava extract in the past but haven't recently ordered any of those. I think that exercise, a proper diet, avoiding substances like alcohol and stimulants, relaxation techniques, introspection, self-education, writing in a journal, getting sufficient sleep, and maintaining a healthy attitude toward life can all be very helpful self-treatments for cyclothymia. I get mild atypical depression from time to time as part of my cyclothymia, which I find is only troublesome when it comes to interpersonal rejection sensitivity. As I've grown older and more self-aware, rejection sensitivity is much less of a problem for me, and developing a better attitude seems like a better approach to that problem than taking a medication. My most difficult symptom can be occasional irritability, which is why I have grown fond of chamomile and other mild anti-anxiety herbs.
Posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2012, at 18:14:05
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » SLS, posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 16:22:35
Makes sense to me as docs have done this to me. Thanks Shawn. Phillipa
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/beware-the-nocebo-effect.html?_r=0
Posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 18:46:26
In reply to Re: nocebo effect, posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2012, at 18:14:05
> Makes sense to me as docs have done this to me. Thanks Shawn. Phillipa
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/opinion/sunday/beware-the-nocebo-effect.html?_r=0You're welcome; that's an interesting article. I'm sorry to hear that you have had trouble with the nocebo effect in the past.
I think that it's important to realize that the prescribing information for many drugs includes a list of side-effects ranked by the percentage of patients who experienced each effect. This information will typically show that the vast majority of patients do not experience each side-effect that is associated with a drug. If more than 9/10 people do not experience a side-effect (which is usually the case), the expectation should ideally be that the effect is possible but not very likely. Hopefully, future generations of psychiatric medications will have fewer side-effects so there will be less to potentially worry about.
Posted by Phillipa on November 9, 2012, at 20:53:19
In reply to Re: nocebo effect » Phillipa, posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 18:46:26
Shawn not only nocebo effect but docs that increase doses much too fast so anxiety kicks into full gear. I had this happen with cymbalta no problem at one time tolerating 60mg with low dose benzo. Moved up here and the doc wanted me to take 30mg week one, 60mg week two, 90mg week three, and 120mg week four. At the time was new drug and the manufacturer only advised up to 60mg. I said this to the doc who replied "I don't care I have better results with this dose". Immediately so terrified I only took it for a few days couldn't tolerate the anxiety. Caused by feeling I was taking something that could hurt me. Phillipa
Posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 0:49:28
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by ShawnThomas on November 9, 2012, at 15:32:30
I didn't really think you had a paternalistic view, but you did raise some interesting points. I was inserting a little sarcasm, perhaps aimed at my experience with mental health care (not just my own). Maybe I like a good debate.
I think it takes a tremendous amount of faith (in something so imperfect) to take psych meds. I like my Pdoc, everything is ultimately my decision, and I trust that he's applying his knowledge toward increasing my quality of life.
The idea, that I can lack some insight, seems so strange to me, but I have to think it is true, even though I'm pretty grounded in reality.
Posted by SLS on November 10, 2012, at 6:41:52
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » ShawnThomas, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 0:49:28
> I didn't really think you had a paternalistic view, but you did raise some interesting points. I was inserting a little sarcasm, perhaps aimed at my experience with mental health care (not just my own). Maybe I like a good debate.
> I think it takes a tremendous amount of faith (in something so imperfect) to take psych meds. I like my Pdoc, everything is ultimately my decision, and I trust that he's applying his knowledge toward increasing my quality of life.
> The idea, that I can lack some insight, seems so strange to me, but I have to think it is true, even though I'm pretty grounded in reality.
I guess one can make the argument that anyone who is mentally ill experiences an alteration in cognition that affects their perception, insight, and judgment. How, then, would one go about making treatment decisions for himself?
- Scott
Posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 11:24:51
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by SLS on November 10, 2012, at 6:41:52
Right. I think it depends on the diagnosis and symptoms.
What's the term?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AnosognosiaBut then there's plain old denial. My therapist has sometimes commented on whether I had one or two feet in the river (that's de Nile). I don't usually agree.
Posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:37:18
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by linkadge on November 8, 2012, at 17:33:10
yea....benzos alter the GABA activity and comes to a point when their discontinued it will disrupt gaba function. What im implying in this whole thing is how to approcated doctors that are difficult. Not implying anything else about drugs and euphoric effects of them. I know vary well of my substance abuse that I have am prone to abuse, yet I personally disclosed my substance abuse freely...i havent hidden anything. And I guess the truth will set us free....only with consequeces from others.
thanks for the post...
r
Posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:40:17
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 9, 2012, at 10:16:06
yesss...i know of my substance abuse history...but is always going to be brought up in every danm post I post? i mean ... god, all the stuff ive posted for benefit to others and all I get in response...is a old reminder of my history...? If I wanted to hear about my history I would post about it. I mean did you get anything out what I posted?
Posted by SLS on November 10, 2012, at 16:10:00
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:40:17
> yesss...i know of my substance abuse history...but is always going to be brought up in every danm post I post? i mean ... god, all the stuff ive posted for benefit to others and all I get in response...is a old reminder of my history...? If I wanted to hear about my history I would post about it. I mean did you get anything out what I posted?
You might acknowledge that you have a substance abuse history, but it might not hurt from time to time to hear from others that it could be getting in the way of your present.
- Scott
Posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 16:55:58
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:40:17
How in the history is it?
I hear that you're frustrated.
I think you're in this corner because you've been your own worst enemy.
Posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2012, at 18:52:27
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » rjlockhart37, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 16:55:58
I've communicated with RJ's Mother via email and this is a huge part of the problem. Family. If RJ wishes to divulge his history he can it's not my right to do so. Phillipa
Posted by jane d on November 10, 2012, at 21:07:39
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2012, at 18:52:27
> I've communicated with RJ's Mother via email and this is a huge part of the problem. Family. If RJ wishes to divulge his history he can it's not my right to do so. Phillipa
No it's not! You have no business posting here about anything you may have learned from either rj or his family since they were naive enough to trust you. I strongly suggest you contact dr bob and beg him to remove your post.
Posted by Phillipa on November 10, 2012, at 23:40:58
In reply to confidences » Phillipa, posted by jane d on November 10, 2012, at 21:07:39
Tomorrow if have time
Posted by jane d on November 11, 2012, at 1:08:43
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:40:17
> yesss...i know of my substance abuse history...but is always going to be brought up in every danm post I post? i mean ... god, all the stuff ive posted for benefit to others and all I get in response...is a old reminder of my history...? If I wanted to hear about my history I would post about it. I mean did you get anything out what I posted?
I think you brought it up in this thread. And I think you're reading into our responses (and probably your doctor's) a criticism that isn't always there. You have a bad reaction to stimulants that not everybody has. No moral judgment - just a bad reaction. If someone here said they'd had an allergic reaction whenever they used a med and then said that they wanted to use that med again you'd see just as many posts reminding them not to use it again. It's what people do when they care.
Posted by SLS on November 11, 2012, at 7:11:04
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » sleepygirl2, posted by rjlockhart37 on November 10, 2012, at 13:40:17
What are the remaining symptoms of your psychiatric condition(s) that you would like to see improved?
For now, I would refrain from exposing your brain to any psychotropic substances that are not part of your treatment regime.
- Scott
Posted by ShawnThomas on November 12, 2012, at 10:00:47
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » ShawnThomas, posted by sleepygirl2 on November 10, 2012, at 0:49:28
> I didn't really think you had a paternalistic view, but you did raise some interesting points. I was inserting a little sarcasm, perhaps aimed at my experience with mental health care (not just my own). Maybe I like a good debate.
> I think it takes a tremendous amount of faith (in something so imperfect) to take psych meds. I like my Pdoc, everything is ultimately my decision, and I trust that he's applying his knowledge toward increasing my quality of life.
> The idea, that I can lack some insight, seems so strange to me, but I have to think it is true, even though I'm pretty grounded in reality.I like a good debate as well. Sometimes I leave out details when writing, and it's always helpful to have others draw them out of me.
Nobody has comprehensive insight into what goes on in his or her brain, but that's just a fact of life. I think that the vast majority of psychiatric patients have sufficient self-insight to make informed decisions about their treatments. No matter how grounded we are in reality, we still must accept that we are unaware of much of what goes on in our brains and how various drugs can affect millions of cells in the brain.
I agree that many psychiatric medications are rather imperfect. I don't believe that everyone who takes psychiatric meds has complete faith in them; many people take them in spite of serious doubts. I admire the courage of many people who take psychiatric drugs; it can often be a rather scary proposition. There are a lot of heroes on this board, and I hope that some of them can learn to see themselves in that way.
Posted by rjlockhart37 on November 12, 2012, at 12:34:09
In reply to Re: playing chess with psychiatry » rjlockhart37, posted by SLS on November 10, 2012, at 16:10:00
hey scott...i know, its just vary annoying when people bring it up when its not being discussed. I mean I aknowedge all the way of it....it happened it it has a prodominate knowing that It may happen again, but what really makes me edge and irritated is that there are tons of posts here from the past of people expirimenting with all these drugs and they never got bad reviews for it. I appeared they where kinda celebrity that everone like to read. I've read people getting extra provgil, and getting some reviews and posting how they mixed it with dextroamphetamine. Its so ironic...
r
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.