Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 101317

Shown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first

Posted by BlueJay Bird on April 1, 2002, at 14:43:09

Dr. Kramer or anyone else with info:

why is it that when starting a psychiatric med, side effects begin immediately, and then it takes several weeks before the med starts to kick in (if it even does)? why do side effects start first, before any benefits of the med? thank you.

 

Re: Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first

Posted by dennison on April 1, 2002, at 15:40:40

In reply to Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first, posted by BlueJay Bird on April 1, 2002, at 14:43:09

HI Sideffects start first because the sideeffects are moreso contingent on properties inherent in drug molecule - antihistamine blockade for instance- drowsiness--- anti muscarinic effect - memory impairment - dry mouth etc -- these are more common of tricyclics off course ...................................................................... Ssri side-effects typically reflect serotonin on gastro intestinal tract -nausea etc. --( initial anxiety fro,etc. serotonin stimulation of still sensitive serotonin post synaptic receptors.
Ssri blockade of serotonin reuptake occurs extremely fast within hrs - thus this initial overload in synapse still has exposure to normal or perhaps over sensitive serotonin post synaptic receptors. ....................................These side effects reflect acute manifestations of the drug and consequent synapse "concentration being much more sustained " ...................................Therapeutic effects - "antidepressive effect" or "anxiety effect",itself comes along latter as it's neuronal plasticity, ""the bodies adaptative mechanism " trying to adjust to the initial over abundance that constitutes the "actual" longer term beneficial effect - namely down regulation of over sensitive receptors but increased serotonin transmission nonetheless through - down regulating the "pre" synaptic (( auto-receptor)) , which might in a sense be referred to as the feedback "off" switch turning down serotonin or norepinephrine release and synthesis . Gene induction, of post synaptic receptor modifications and down stream transmitting mechanisms which takes some time to come about, is significant adaptation also, but is slow in a relevant sense compared to initial acute drug effect.. ........................Thus all this adapting and eventually -re-establishing of enhanced neurotransmitter functionality takes over a period of considerable time -"thus the time lag" sometimes several weeks , while side-effects happen many times from very first dose:( .........................................................Btw --many think ssri's inc. "serotonin" or in case of tricyclics "norepinephrine and serotonin" is inc. in amount in brain, actually there is less - it's just since it remains in synapse longer due to blockade of reuptake thus "removal from synapse" -- is blocked " that the effect is more pronounced and sustained. The actual production of the neurotransmitter " aka turnover" is less , less is produced but effect is more :):). Because more transmitter is available to stimulate "post" synaptic receptors - thus bring about a behavior response !!!!!! Course it's the end result of behavior response which is wanted obviously-- otherwise --((((why bother))) :):)...

 

Re: Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first

Posted by Dr. Kramer on April 2, 2002, at 9:32:51

In reply to Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first, posted by BlueJay Bird on April 1, 2002, at 14:43:09

> Dr. Kramer or anyone else with info:
>
> why is it that when starting a psychiatric med, side effects begin immediately, and then it takes several weeks before the med starts to kick in (if it even does)? why do side effects start first, before any benefits of the med? thank you.

Great question. Short answer: no one knows for sure. What we do know is that side effects (s/e)tend to be much worse when the amount of drug in the blood is changing as oppssed to steady, so s/e are always going to be worse when you start a new med until the amount you take every day is about the same as the amount your body burns up every day. The big difference with psych meds between s/e and desired effect is that the latter is behaviorally based as well as phyiologically based, while s/e are usually pure physiology. As a result, it takes longer to get an effect because its a downstream phenomenon. In my columns, I've written that it's like playing Pool, only in this case you hit a ball to hit a ball, to hit a ball probably many times over. This takes time.

 

A downstream phenomenon. Love it. (nm)

Posted by Zo on April 3, 2002, at 17:16:13

In reply to Re: Kramer (or anyone) why do side effects start first, posted by Dr. Kramer on April 2, 2002, at 9:32:51


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.