Psycho-Babble Medication Thread 21167

Shown: posts 1 to 7 of 7. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising

Posted by Phil on February 11, 2000, at 15:19:45

Just spoke to the FDA and P.U. just issued a press release on Reboxetine. In his words,"It doesn't look too promising". He is going to mail me the press release but I guess it will be old news by the time I get it. Bummer

 

Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising

Posted by pattyG on February 11, 2000, at 20:13:04

In reply to FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising, posted by Phil on February 11, 2000, at 15:19:45

> Just spoke to the FDA and P.U. just issued a press release on Reboxetine. In his words,"It doesn't look too promising". He is going to mail me the press release but I guess it will be old news by the time I get it. Bummer


///Oh no. Now I think *I* am going to go into depression.

 

Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising

Posted by JohnL on February 12, 2000, at 3:31:38

In reply to FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising, posted by Phil on February 11, 2000, at 15:19:45

> Just spoke to the FDA and P.U. just issued a press release on Reboxetine. In his words,"It doesn't look too promising". He is going to mail me the press release but I guess it will be old news by the time I get it. Bummer


Like other people have already mentioned, it is very easy to have Reboxetine shipped right to your mailbox for about $70. Whether the FDA approves it or not is irrelevent. It's easily and legally available to anyone who wants it, right now.

 

Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising

Posted by Phil on February 12, 2000, at 7:32:24

In reply to Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising, posted by JohnL on February 12, 2000, at 3:31:38

JohnL, I have already ordered and received Rebox from IAS months ago. I think you would agree that it is a little easier for many people to go to their corner drugstore and have insurance pay for most of it. I posted this because a lot of people are curious. You think Prozac's sales would be where they are if everyone had to order it from overseas.

Phil

 

Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising

Posted by Scott L. Schofield on February 12, 2000, at 8:19:33

In reply to Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising, posted by Phil on February 12, 2000, at 7:32:24

> I have already ordered and received Rebox from IAS months ago. I think you would agree that it is a little easier for many people to go to their corner drugstore and have insurance pay for most of it. I posted this because a lot of people are curious. You think Prozac's sales would be where they are if everyone had to order it from overseas.

My doctor has decided to try reboxetine next. For me, the prospect of "getting hooked" on a drug for which I must depend on the availability and logistics of obtaining it from overseas, without being able to buy it in bulk, is a depressing thought. Because I will need to take medication for the rest of my life, I would feel far more comfortable if it were indeed available at the corner drug store. I am at a point now, after having read these posts, to forego the reboxetine and give Nardil just one more try.

Thanks for the info, guys.


- Scott

 

Re: FDA-Rebox. Site with press release

Posted by Phil on February 12, 2000, at 9:25:13

In reply to Re: FDA-Rebox. doesn't look too promising, posted by Scott L. Schofield on February 12, 2000, at 8:19:33

To read the press release go to

www.coreynahman dot com

 

Re: Reboxetine--text of 2/10 press release

Posted by jd on February 12, 2000, at 15:07:42

In reply to Re: FDA-Rebox. Site with press release, posted by Phil on February 12, 2000, at 9:25:13

Here it is: The following press release was pulled from Bloomberg.com, as accessed through the coreynahan.com site mentioned by Phil above. Doesn't it seem ridiculous to question reboxetine's efficacy because a single study showed BOTH reboxetine and prozac to be comparable to placebo? Since prozac's efficacy would seem tough to question at this point, all this would seem to mean to me is that the study was overloaded with placebo responders!
---------------------------------------------

Pharmacia & Upjohn in Dialogue with FDA Regarding VESTRA(TM)

PEAPACK, N.J., Feb. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.
(NYSE: PNU) today announced that is has initiated additional dialogue with the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding its New Drug Application
(NDA) for VESTRA (reboxetine mesylate tablets) in anticipation of a
February 23, 2000 FDA action date. VESTRA, an antidepressant, is a selective
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (selective NRI) that works on the
norepinephrine chemical pathway in the brain.

The company submitted an NDA for VESTRA on April 29, 1998, and received an
approvable letter on July 28, 1999. The original submission was based on data
from studies conducted outside the U.S. At the request of FDA, the company
submitted data from two additional U.S. studies which were in process at the
time of the original submission. While one of the two studies showed some
positive results, the second study comparing VESTRA and Prozac (fluoxetine) to
placebo did not demonstrate difference from placebo for either Prozac or
VESTRA for the primary efficacy endpoint. A high placebo response rate is not
uncommon in clinical trials for antidepressant products. The safety and side
effect data for VESTRA from the two U.S. studies are consistent with the data
in the original NDA filed by the company which support the safety and
tolerability profile of VESTRA.

Pharmacia & Upjohn is a global, innovation-driven pharmaceutical and
health care company. Pharmacia & Upjohn's products, services, and employees
demonstrate its commitment to improve wellness and quality of life for people
around the world.

This news release contains certain forward-looking statements, including,
among other things, statements regarding the company's results of operations,
regulatory actions, and expected closing date of the merger. These forward-
looking statements are based on current expectations, but actual results may
differ materially from anticipated future events or results. Certain factors
which could cause the company's results to differ materially from expected and
historical results are described in the company's periodic reports filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the company's 1998 annual
report on Forms 10-K and Exhibits 99 thereto.

The company has filed a preliminary joint proxy statement and prospectus
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), and
will be filing a definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus and other
relevant information and documents concerning the merger with the SEC.
PHARMACIA & UPJOHN URGES INVESTORS TO READ THE DEFINITIVE JOINT PROXY
STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED WITH THE
SEC, BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors will be able to
obtain the documents free of charge at the SEC's website, www.sec.gov. In
addition, documents filed with the SEC by Pharmacia & Upjohn will be available
free of charge from the Corporate Secretary of Pharmacia & Upjohn, 100 Route
206 North, Peapack, NJ 07977, Telephone 888-768-5501. READ THE DEFINITIVE
JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING A DECISION CONCERNING
THE MERGER.

Pharmacia & Upjohn, its directors, executive officers and certain other
members of management and employees may be soliciting proxies from Pharmacia &
Upjohn stockholders in favor of the merger. Information concerning the
participants in the solicitation is included in filings under Rule 425 made by
Pharmacia & Upjohn with the SEC on January 27, 2000.

SOURCE Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.
-0- 02/10/2000
/CONTACT: Media: Paul Fitzhenry, 908-901-8770, or Analysts: Craig Tooman,
908-901-8853, both for Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc./
/Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com/comp/884150.html or fax,
800-758-5804, ext. 884150/
/Web site: http://www.pnu.com/
(PNU)

CO: Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.
ST: New Jersey
IN: MTC
SU:

-0- Feb/10/2000 11:11
EOS (PRN) Feb/10/2000 11:11 85

-0- (PRN) Feb/10/2000 11:26



This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.