![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 15 to 39 of 64. Go back in thread:
Posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 14:00:34
In reply to never at 3am did i think, posted by wildcardII on August 7, 2006, at 1:53:05
It's hard to see but it sticks out. To me it's a little pee pee. So your're up with Breanna. Love Phillipa
Posted by wildcardII on August 7, 2006, at 15:34:48
In reply to Re: never at 3am did i think » wildcardII, posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 14:00:34
Posted by cheesesteak on August 7, 2006, at 15:59:55
In reply to Girl or Boy? and a cute one!!!!!!, posted by Phillipa on August 6, 2006, at 19:07:48
Posted by Dinah on August 7, 2006, at 16:15:08
In reply to Re: never at 3am did i think » wildcardII, posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 14:00:34
It's built to do what nature intends. Have you ever seen puppies being born? You can probably do a google search to show the reason she's built as she is.
Posted by wildcardII on August 7, 2006, at 16:30:29
In reply to would there be puppy boy balls though??? (nm), posted by wildcardII on August 7, 2006, at 15:34:48
much about pups that young...
Posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 16:32:59
In reply to Re: never at 3am did i think » Phillipa, posted by Dinah on August 7, 2006, at 16:15:08
Dinah really you're so strong in your conviction. I just don't understand why it looks like a pee pee. Did you raise dogs? Love Phillipa Ps I've seen cats born when I was a kid.
Posted by cheesesteak on August 7, 2006, at 16:59:27
In reply to Girl or Boy? and a cute one!!!!!!, posted by Phillipa on August 6, 2006, at 19:07:48
Well, my dog's definitely a female and her.....whatever...looks just like that, only seriously bigger (remember? 30+ pounds at 4 months).
Posted by Dinah on August 7, 2006, at 17:09:44
In reply to Re: never at 3am did i think » Dinah, posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 16:32:59
I'd rather not get into the specifics about it, but I'm not inexperienced.
Go ahead and check it out with your vet, if you prefer.
Posted by Phillipa on August 7, 2006, at 17:18:35
In reply to Re: never at 3am did i think » Phillipa, posted by Dinah on August 7, 2006, at 17:09:44
Dinah that's okay. I'll google what you recommended. I trust your judgement.Love Phillipa
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2006, at 17:37:18
In reply to Can a dog have a pussy?? (nm), posted by cheesesteak on August 7, 2006, at 15:59:55
> Can a dog have a p[*]ssy??
Please don't use language that could offend others.
But please don't take this personally, either, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please first see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforceFollow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil -- and in particular, shouldn't use the previous subject line as is.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Glydin on August 8, 2006, at 10:11:16
In reply to Re: Girl or Boy? and a cute one!!!!!! » Phillipa, posted by cheesesteak on August 7, 2006, at 16:59:27
Posted by Glydin on August 8, 2006, at 16:23:55
In reply to Girl (nm), posted by Glydin on August 8, 2006, at 10:11:16
Posted by cheesesteak on August 8, 2006, at 19:17:52
In reply to Re: please be civil » cheesesteak, posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2006, at 17:37:18
This is load of horse excrement. I used a word for a play on words but realize that your PBC was based on a dictionary definition of the word that indicates that it is vulgar. BUT someone used the word b*lls (like an asterisk makes all the difference in the *&%$# world) and didn't get an honorable mention although b*lls also is defined in Webster's as vulgar. So, WTF, Bob????!!!!
Posted by wildcardII on August 8, 2006, at 19:28:19
In reply to Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob, posted by cheesesteak on August 8, 2006, at 19:17:52
Posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 20:32:14
In reply to Girl (nm), posted by Glydin on August 8, 2006, at 10:11:16
Oh the count is l0 in the neighborhood say boy and two for girl. But then another neighbor walking her female dog came to see her and had her older female dog roll over. She's overwt. But inbetween there was still a little one. Love Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 21:06:37
In reply to Re: Girl » Glydin, posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 20:32:14
Gyndin I just don't know. Love Phillipa
Posted by Dinah on August 8, 2006, at 21:20:53
In reply to Re: Girl, posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 21:06:37
Phillipa, that's Chloe's vulva. Roll Teddy over. See where his penis is? It's midway on his belly. Have you ever picked him up at the small part of his waist? That's more or less where his penis is.
Roll Chloe over. Flat smooth tummy. Further back, between her legs, there's a vulva. It's small, fleshy and V shaped. It's not solid. Within its folds is her vagina. Look at Teddy again. His penis has a small hole, not a vagina.
Should you leave Chloe unneutered, and she comes in heat, her vulva will swell to a quite noticeable size, and her vagina will be quite obvious to you, and to Teddy. The purpose of its placement toward the rear of her body will become quite obvious if Teddy also isn't neutered.
You can show Chloe's vulva to everyone in your city, and it won't change the fact that she's a girl. A perfectly lovely girl dog with a perfectly normal vulva between her legs, not a penis on her belly.
Posted by Gabbi~G on August 8, 2006, at 21:43:48
In reply to sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone... (nm), posted by wildcardII on August 8, 2006, at 19:28:19
I suspect the offence wasn't directed toward you.
I think it was the same sort of WTH? puzzlement we've discussed on admin, about how putting a little * in words seems very important to some, and others like us can't fathom what difference it makes.
Posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 22:24:47
In reply to Re: sorry, didn't mean to offend anyone... » wildcardII, posted by Gabbi~G on August 8, 2006, at 21:43:48
Wow I can't believe the anatomy of a puppy has caused all this. I sorry for starting the Thread. No wonder so many are leaving and not feeling safe. Love Phillipa
Posted by Phillipa on August 8, 2006, at 22:42:34
In reply to Re: Girl - Sexually graphic trigger, posted by Dinah on August 8, 2006, at 21:20:53
Dinah you almost had me laughing. Not by what you described by my husband almost jumping up and down in glee wanting to be right. I'd roll Teddy over but boy he's getting fat!!!!. Chloe has so much fur I can't see beneath the fur. But urine comes from that thing. Love phillpa. Sorry for all the puppy problems.
Posted by Tabitha on August 9, 2006, at 0:26:23
In reply to Re: Girl - Sexually graphic trigger, posted by Dinah on August 8, 2006, at 21:20:53
Dinah thank you for that clear and concise lesson in female dog anatomy.
Posted by Dinah on August 9, 2006, at 0:41:29
In reply to Re: Girl - Sexually graphic trigger » Dinah, posted by Tabitha on August 9, 2006, at 0:26:23
lol. You're welcome.
I have the oddest fonts of knowledge.
Posted by madeline on August 9, 2006, at 12:42:10
In reply to Re: please be civil » cheesesteak, posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2006, at 17:37:18
I thought that was clearly a joke (and a pretty funny one at that).
It would have been different if he had CALLED someone that.
I think you were jumping the gun a little bit there too.
Maddie
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 11, 2006, at 1:41:28
In reply to Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob, posted by cheesesteak on August 8, 2006, at 19:17:52
> I used a word for a play on words but realize that your PBC was based on a dictionary definition of the word that indicates that it is vulgar. BUT someone used the word b*lls (like an asterisk makes all the difference in the *&%$# world) and didn't get an honorable mention although b*lls also is defined in Webster's as vulgar.
Sorry, I hadn't looked up that one, I'll try to be alert for it in the future. Your play on words would've been fine with an asterisk. I'm not saying it makes all the difference in the world, just some. Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Dinah on August 11, 2006, at 7:48:44
In reply to Re: dictionary definitions, posted by Dr. Bob on August 11, 2006, at 1:41:28
No way to apply autoasterisking to subject lines?
Because people just don't *know*. I might have guessed about the synonym for kitten (although maybe not, since it was a play on words), but it wouldn't have occurred to me in a million years about b*lls. Seems quite a sensible and acceptable euphemism to me.
I liked the curse word rule a lot better once you added autoasterisking, because then it was more likely to be an intentional override. But if you can't apply it to subject lines, I think you should just give a heads up, not a PBC, unless it's the f- word or something like that. (Yes, I know you see a PBC as a heads up, but there's a distinction to posters I think.)
JMHO.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.